Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36650015›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2023

Pandemic preparedness and response: beyond the Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator.

Abha Saxena, Brook K Baker, Amanda Banda, Anders Herlitz, Jennifer Miller, Karrar Karrar, Marc Fleurbaey, Esther Chiwa, Caesar Alimisnya Atuire, Iwao Hirose and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Abha SaxenaIndependent Bioethics Advisor, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-120X
Brook K BakerNortheastern University School of Law, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amanda BandaWemos, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Anders HerlitzDepartment of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden andersherlitz@gmail.com.
Jennifer MillerYale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Karrar KarrarInternational Development Department, Save the Children, London, UK.
Marc FleurbaeyParis School of Economics, Paris, France.
Esther ChiwaExpanded Program on Immunization, Malawi Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Caesar Alimisnya AtuirePhilosophy and Classics, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-6825-6916
Iwao HirosePhilosophy, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Nicole HassounPhilosophy, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5547-1710

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nationalism has trumped solidarity, resulting in unnecessary loss of life and inequitable access to vaccines and therapeutics. Existing intellectual property (IP) regimens, trade secrets and data rights, under which pharmaceutical firms operate, have also posed obstacles to increasing manufacturing capacity, and ensuring adequate supply, affordable pricing, and equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines and other health products in low-income and middle- income countries. We propose: (1) Implementing alternative incentive and funding mechanisms to develop new scientific innovations to address infectious diseases with pandemic potential; (2) Voluntary and involuntary initiatives to overcome IP barriers including pooling IP, sharing data and vesting licences for resulting products in a globally agreed entity; (3) Transparent and accountable collective procurement to enable equitable distribution; (4) Investments in regionally distributed research and development (R&D) capacity and manufacturing, basic health systems to expand equitable access to essential health technologies, and non-discriminatory national distribution; (5) Commitment to strengthen national (and regional) initiatives in the areas of health system development, health research, drug and vaccine manufacturing and regulatory oversight and (6) Good governance of the pandemic prevention, preparedness and response accord. It is important to articulate principles for deals that include reasonable access conditions and transparency in negotiations. We argue for an equitable, transparent, accountable new global agreement to provide rewards for R&D but only on the condition that pharmaceutical companies share the IP rights necessary to produce and distribute them globally. Moreover, if countries commit to collective procurement and fair pricing of resulting products, we argue that we can greatly improve our ability to prepare for and respond to pandemic threats.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsPharmaceutical PreparationsPovertyCOVID-19 VaccinesPharmaceutical PreparationsHealth policyHealth systemsPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID36650015
PMCPMC9852735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.