Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649695›Full record

ArticlePathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology2023

GATA3 Expression in Human Tumors: A Tissue Microarray Study on 16,557 Tumors.

Viktor Reiswich, Carol E Schmidt, Maximilian Lennartz, Doris Höflmayer, Claudia Hube-Magg, Sören Weidemann, Christoph Fraune, Franziska Büscheck, Katharina Möller, Christian Bernreuther and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathobiology : journal of immunopathology, molecular and cellular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Multidimensional roles and clinical significance of GATA3 in breast cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Viktor ReiswichInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Carol E SchmidtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maximilian LennartzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Doris HöflmayerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Claudia Hube-MaggInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sören WeidemannInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christoph FrauneInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Franziska BüscheckInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina MöllerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Christian BernreutherInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ronald SimonInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till S ClauditzInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Niclas C BlessinInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Elena BadyInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Guido SauterInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ria UhligInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Stefan SteurerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Sarah MinnerInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
David DumInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andreas H MarxInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Till KrechInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick LebokInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Andrea HinschInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Frank JacobsenInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGATA3 is a transcription factor involved in epithelial cell differentiation. GATA3 immunostaining is used as a diagnostic marker for breast and urothelial cancer but can also occur in other neoplasms.

methodsTo evaluate GATA3 in normal and tumor tissues, a tissue microarray containing 16,557 samples from 131 different tumor types and subtypes and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed by immunohistochemistry.

resultsGATA3 positivity was found in 69 different tumor types including 23 types (18%) with at least one strongly positive tumor. Highest positivity rates occurred in noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinoma (92-99%), lobular carcinoma (98%), carcinoma of no special type of the breast (92%), basal cell carcinoma of the skin (97%), invasive urothelial carcinoma (73%), T-cell lymphoma (23%), adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland (16%), squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (16%), and colorectal neuroendocrine carcinoma (12%). In breast cancer, low GATA3 staining was linked to high pT stage (p = 0.03), high BRE grade (p < 0.0001), HER2 overexpression (p = 0.0085), estrogen and progesterone receptor negativity (p < 0.0001 each), and reduced survival (p = 0.03).

conclusionOur data demonstrate that GATA3 positivity can occur in various tumor entities. Low levels of GATA3 reflect cancer progression and poor patient prognosis in breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGATA3 Transcription FactorHumansBiomarkers, TumorGATA3 protein, humanGATA3 Transcription FactorGATA3Human carcinomasImmunohistochemistryTissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID36649695
PMCPMC10937041
OpenAlexW4317037202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.