Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649692›Full record

ArticleEuropean addiction research2023

Systematic Client Feedback in Youth Mental Health and Addiction Care: A Controlled Study Comparing Two Treatment Cohorts.

Patty van Benthem, Renske Spijkerman, Peter Blanken, Albert Boon, Robert Vermeiren, Vincent Hendriks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European addiction research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patty van BenthemDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Renske SpijkermanParnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Parnassia Academy, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Peter BlankenParnassia Addiction Research Centre (PARC), Parnassia Academy, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Albert BoonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Robert VermeirenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent HendriksDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, LUMC Curium, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe investigated the value of systematic client feedback in youth mental health and addiction care. In the present study, we examined whether a client feedback intervention would result in improved therapeutic alliance and treatment outcomes.

methodsTwo hundred and four adolescents participated in the study using a - non-randomized - between-group A/B design. In the first study group, 127 patients were offered 4 months of treatment as usual (TAU), and in the second study group, 77 patients received the client feedback intervention as an add-on to TAU during 4 months.

resultsYouths who received systematic client feedback in addition to TAU did not show better treatment outcomes or better alliance ratings after 4 months than youths receiving TAU only. Sensitivity analyses, in which we compared the more adherent patients of the second study group with patients receiving TAU, did not show significant beneficial effects of client feedback either. Also, the client feedback intervention did not result in lower rates of early treatment drop-out. DISCUSSION/

conclusionOur results cautiously suggest that client feedback does not have incremental effects on alliance and the treatment outcome for youth in mental health and addiction treatment. Moreover, our study highlights the challenges of implementing client feedback in clinical practice and the need for additional research addressing these challenges.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveMental HealthAdolescentFeedbackHumansTreatment OutcomeAddiction careClient feedbackTherapeutic allianceTreatment outcomeYouth

Identifiers

PMID36649692
PMCPMC9932826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.