Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649579›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2023

Veterans Health Administration National TeleOncology Service.

Leah L Zullig, Whitney Raska, Gina McWhirter, Scott E Sherman, Danil Makarov, Daniel Becker, Heather A King, John Pura, Amy S Jeffreys, Susanne Danus and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. A Framework for Integrating Telehealth Equitably across the cancer care continuum.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  10. Telehealth Research and Innovation for Veterans with Cancer: the THRIVE Center.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leah L ZulligCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0002-6638-409X
Whitney RaskaDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Oncology Program, Washington, DC.
Gina McWhirterDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Oncology Program, Washington, DC.
Scott E ShermanVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0003-1752-7303
Danil MakarovVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY.
Daniel BeckerVA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7230-8432
Heather A KingCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.
John PuraCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.
Amy S JeffreysCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.ORCID 0000-0001-9565-248X
Susanne DanusCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.
Vida PasseroDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-4292
Karen M GoldsteinCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC.
Michael J KelleyDepartment of Veterans Affairs, National Oncology Program, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0001-9523-6080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the largest integrated health care system in the United States, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) is a leader in telehealth-delivered care. All 10 million Veterans cared for within the VA are eligible for telehealth. The VA cares for approximately 46,000 Veteran patients with newly diagnosed cancer and an estimated 400,000 prevalent cases annually. With nearly 38% of VA health care system users residing in rural areas and only 44% of rural counties having an oncologist, many Veterans lack local access to specialized cancer services.

methodsWe describe the VA's National TeleOncology (NTO) Service. NTO was established to provide Veterans with the opportunity for specialized treatment regardless of geographical location. Designed as a hub-and-spoke model, VA oncologists from across the country can provide care to patients at spoke sites. Spoke sites are smaller and rural VA medical centers that are less able to independently provide the full range of services available at larger facilities. In addition to smaller rural spoke sites, NTO also provides subspecialized oncology care to Veterans located in larger VA medical facilities that do not have subspecialties available or that have limited capacity.

resultsAs of fiscal year 2021, 23 clinics are served by or engaged in planning for delivery of NTO and there are 24 physicians providing care through the NTO virtual hub. Most NTO physicians continue to provide patient care in separate traditional in-person clinics. Approximately 4,300 unique Veterans have used NTO services. Approximately half (52%) of Veterans using NTO lived in rural areas. Most of these Veterans had more than one remote visit through NTO.

conclusionNTO is a state-of-the-art model that has the potential to revolutionize the way cancer care is delivered, which should improve the experience of Veterans receiving cancer care.

Indexed as

TelemedicineVeteransDelivery of Health CareHumansPatient CareUnited StatesVeterans Health

Identifiers

PMID36649579
PMCPMC10113113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.