Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649403›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Mobility and kinship in the world's first village societies.

Jessica Pearson, Jane Evans, Angela Lamb, Douglas Baird, Ian Hodder, Arkadiusz Marciniak, Clark Spencer Larsen, Christopher J Knüsel, Scott D Haddow, Marin A Pilloud and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inference of human pigmentation from ancient DNA by genotype likelihoods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The past 12,000 years of behavior, adaptation, population, and evolution shaped who we are today.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Jessica PearsonDepartment of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7WZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1041
Jane EvansNational Environmental Isotope Facility, British Geological Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United Kingdom.
Angela LambNational Environmental Isotope Facility, British Geological Survey, Nottingham NG12 5GG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1809-4327
Douglas BairdDepartment of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7WZ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-5272
Ian HodderArchaeology Center, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305.
Arkadiusz MarciniakFaculty of Archaeology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland.
Clark Spencer LarsenDepartment of Anthropology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-8417
Christopher J KnüselUMR-5199 De la Préhistorie á L'Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie (PACEA), Université de Bordeaux, Pessac Cedex, 33615 France.ORCID 0000-0002-2506-3652
Scott D HaddowDepartment of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3970-7447
Marin A PilloudDepartment of Anthropology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557.ORCID 0000-0002-1704-3707
Amy BogaardInstitute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6716-8890
Andrew FairbairnSchool of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia.
Jo-Hannah PlugDepartment of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7WZ, United Kingdom.
Camilla MazzucatoDepartment of Cross-Cultural and Regional Studies, University of Copenhagen, 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4168-0773
Gökhan MustafaoğluDepartment of Archaeology, Faculty of Letters, Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli University, Yenimahalle, 06570 Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9726-172X
Michal FeldmanArchaeo- and Palaeogenetics Group, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, University of Tübingen, 72074 Tübingen, Germany.
Mehmet SomelDepartment of Biological Sciences: Biology/Molecular Biology and Genetics, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey.
Eva Fernández-DomínguezDepartment of Archaeology, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
University of Liverpool · GBBritish Geological Survey · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLAnkara Hacı Bayram Veli University · TRDurham University · GBMiddle East Technical University · TRSanta Fe Institute · USSenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DEStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversité de Bordeaux · FRUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 10,000 y ago in southwest Asia, the cessation of a mobile lifestyle and the emergence of the first village communities during the Neolithic marked a fundamental change in human history. The first communities were small (tens to hundreds of individuals) but remained semisedentary. So-called megasites appeared soon after, occupied by thousands of more sedentary inhabitants. Accompanying this shift, the material culture and ancient ecological data indicate profound changes in economic and social behavior. A shift from residential to logistical mobility and increasing population size are clear and can be explained by either changes in fertility and/or aggregation of local groups. However, as sedentism increased, small early communities likely risked inbreeding without maintaining or establishing exogamous relationships typical of hunter-gatherers. Megasites, where large populations would have made endogamy sustainable, could have avoided this risk. To examine the role of kinship practices in the rise of megasites, we measured strontium and oxygen isotopes in tooth enamel from 99 individuals buried at Pınarbaşı, Boncuklu, and Çatalhöyük (Turkey) over 7,000 y. These sites are geographically proximate and, critically, span both early sedentary behaviors (Pınarbaşı and Boncuklu) and the rise of a local megasite (Çatalhöyük). Our data are consistent with the presence of only local individuals at Pınarbaşı and Boncuklu, whereas at Çatalhöyük, several nonlocals are present. The Çatalhöyük data stand in contrast to other megasites where bioarchaeological evidence has pointed to strict endogamy. These different kinship behaviors suggest that megasites may have arisen by employing unique, community-specific kinship practices.

Indexed as

Life StyleSocial BehaviorHistory, AncientHumansSedentary BehaviorStrontiumTurkeyStrontiumearly villageskinshipstable isotopes

Identifiers

PMID36649403
PMCPMC9942817
OpenAlexW4317037334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.