Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649357›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2023

Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ning Xu, Linmu Chen, Lulu Liu, Wei Rong

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05945706 (Evaluation of Renal Resistance Index by Doppler Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery with Controlled Hypotension), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05945706 completednot on this map

Evaluation of Renal Resistance Index by Doppler Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery with Controlled Hypotension

TypeobservationalSponsorAnkara Diskapi Training and Research HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled65ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Hypotension, Controlled, Renal Failure, Ultrasonography, Doppler
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Key Risk Factors for Postoperative Hypotension in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients After Endoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ning XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Weihai Central Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University, Wendeng, Weihai, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8634-3159
Linmu ChenDepartment of Pain Medicine, Weihai Central Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University, Wendeng, Weihai, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Lulu LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Weihai Central Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University, Wendeng District, Weihai, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Wei RongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Weihai Central Hospital affiliated to Qingdao University, Wendeng, Weihai, Shandong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-7747-0228
Qingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension under general anesthesia. We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, Wanfang, and VIP databases, as well as dissertations and conference papers, to obtain randomized controlled trials comparing remifentanil and dexmedetomidine applied respectively for controlled hypotension before August 23, 2021. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic profiles, surgical field score, and blood loss. Extubation time, sedation and pain score at the PACU, and perioperative adverse events were the secondary outcomes. Nine randomized controlled trials with 543 patients (272 in the dexmedetomidine group and 271 in the remifentanil group) were eventually included. This meta-analysis indicated no significant difference between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in terms of surgical field score, blood loss, minimum values of mean arterial pressure (MD 0.24 with 95% CI [-1.65, 2.13], P = 0.80, I2 = 66%) and heart rate (MD 0.42 [-1.33, 2.17], P = 0.64, I2 = 40%), sedation scores at the PACU (MD -0.09 [-0.69, 0.50], P = 0.76, I2 = 92%), and incidence of bradycardia (OR 2.24 [0.70, 7.15], P = 0.17, I2 = 0%). Compared with remifentanil, dexmedetomidine as the controlled hypotensive agent showed a lower visual analogue score at the PACU (MD -1.01 [-1.25, -0.77], P<0.00001, I2 = 0%) and incidence of shivering (OR 0.22 [0.08, 0.60], P = 0.003, I2 = 0%), nausea, and vomiting (OR 0.34 [0.13, 0.89], P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). However, extubation time was shorter in the remifentanil group (MD 3.34 [0.75, 5.93], P = 0.01, I2 = 90%). In conclusion, dexmedetomidine and remifentanil are both effective in providing satisfactory controlled hypotension and surgical conditions. Dexmedetomidine is better in easing postoperative pain at the PACU and reducing the occurrence of shivering, nausea, and vomiting. Meanwhile, remifentanil is a fast-track anesthesia with a shorter extubation time. Given the limitations of this meta-analysis, further studies are needed for a more definitive comparison of the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil.

Indexed as

DexmedetomidineHypotension, ControlledAnesthesia, GeneralHumansNauseaRemifentanilVomitingDexmedetomidineRemifentanil

Identifiers

PMID36649357
PMCPMC9844847
OpenAlexW4316928474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.