Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649218›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2023

Mnemicity: A Cognitive Gadget?

Johannes B Mahr, Penny van Bergen, John Sutton, Daniel L Schacter, Cecilia Heyes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Eliminating episodic memory?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Episodic recombination and the role of time in mental travel.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johannes B MahrDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Penny van BergenSchool of Education, University of Wollongong.
John SuttonDepartment of Philosophy, Macquarie University.
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Cecilia HeyesAll Souls College, University of Oxford.ORCID 0000-0001-9119-9913

Funding

Episodic Retrieval and Problem Solving in AgingR01AG008441 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 1989 to 2022
$3.1M
TERMINATE CA2+ RELEASE BY LOCAL INACTIVATION OF RYANODINE RECEPTORS(RYR)IN HEARTZ01AG000841 · NIA · AGING · PI CHENG, HEPING · 1996 to 2004
–
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AG000841NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic representations can be entertained either as "remembered" or "imagined"-as outcomes of experience or as simulations of such experience. Here, we argue that this feature is the product of a dedicated cognitive function: the metacognitive capacity to determine the

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicMetacognitionEmotionsHumansImaginationLearningMental Recallcultural learningmemory and imaginationmental time travelreality monitoring

Identifiers

PMID36649218
PMCPMC11759954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.