ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2023
Learning to detect auditory signals in noise: Active top-down selection and stable change in signal representations.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impacts of listening practice on work performance while wearing hearing protection.Discover public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Training can improve detection of auditory signals in noise. This learning could potentially occur through active top-down selection mechanisms or stable changes in signal representations. Here, participants were trained and tested (pretest vs. posttest design) on abilities to detect pure tone signals in noise. Auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) to tones were gathered under dichotic listening conditions where participants attended to nontonal stimuli in the opposite ear. Improvements in detection sensitivity were observable regardless of tested tone frequency. This was true in generalization between 861 Hz and 1058-Hz tones (Experiment 1a), and when testing a frequency range > 1 octave (Experiment 2). Such learning was not apparent without training (Experiment 1b). In contrast to behavior, AEP amplitude increases from pre- to posttest were partially specific to trained tone frequencies, even when selective attention was diverted to the opposite ear of tone presentation. Placed in the context of previous work, results suggest that changes in active top-down selection mechanisms and stable signal representations both play a role in auditory detection learning. The mismatch between AEP and behavioral effects suggests a need to consider how these different learning processes can impact detection performance in the variety of listening scenarios a listener may face. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.