Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649048›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Binocular Information Improves the Reliability and Consistency of Pictorial Relief.

Paul B Hibbard, Rebecca L Hornsey, Jordi M Asher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul B HibbardDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-6729
Rebecca L HornseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.
Jordi M AsherDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-9715

Funding

British Academy MD130066Leverhulme Trust RPG-2016-361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular disparity is an important cue to three-dimensional shape. We assessed the contribution of this cue to the reliability and consistency of depth in stereoscopic photographs of natural scenes. Observers viewed photographs of cluttered scenes while adjusting a gauge figure to indicate the apparent three-dimensional orientation of the surfaces of objects. The gauge figure was positioned on the surfaces of objects at multiple points in the scene, and settings were made under monocular and binocular, stereoscopic viewing. Settings were used to create a depth relief map, indicating the apparent three-dimensional structure of the scene. We found that binocular cues increased the magnitude of apparent depth, the reliability of settings across repeated measures, and the consistency of perceived depth across participants. These results show that binocular cues make an important contribution to the precise and accurate perception of depth in natural scenes that contain multiple pictorial cues.

Indexed as

3D visionbinocular disparitybinocular visiondepth-cue combinationdepth perceptionnatural imagespictorial reliefstereopsisvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36649048
PMCPMC9844501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.