Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36649018›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Computer-Based Simulators in Pharmacy Practice Education: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Ahmed M Gharib, Ivan K Bindoff, Gregory M Peterson, Mohammed S Salahudeen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed M GharibSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-8745
Ivan K BindoffSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8170-8339
Gregory M PetersonSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6764-3882
Mohammed S SalahudeenSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS 7005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9131-7465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-based simulations may represent an innovative, flexible, and cost-efficient training approach that has been underutilised in pharmacy practice education. This may need to change, with increasing pressure on clinical placement availability, COVID-19 restrictions, and economic pressures to improve teaching efficiency. This systematic narrative review summarises various computer-based simulations described in the pharmacy practice education literature, identifies the currently available products, and highlights key characteristics. Five major databases were searched (Medline, CINAHL, ERIC, Education Source and Embase). Authors also manually reviewed the publication section of major pharmacy simulator websites and performed a citation analysis. We identified 49 studies describing 29 unique simulators, which met the inclusion criteria. Only eight of these simulators were found to be currently available. The characteristics of these eight simulators were examined through the lens of eight main criteria (feedback type, grading, user play mode, cost, operational requirement, community/hospital setting, scenario sharing option, and interaction elements). Although a number of systems have been developed and trialled, relatively few are available on the market, and each comes with benefits and drawbacks. Educators are encouraged to consider their own institutional, professional and curriculum needs, and determine which product best aligns with their teaching goals.

Indexed as

and case-based simulationcomputer-based simulationonline simulationpharmacy educationpharmacy practice educationvirtual patientvirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID36649018
PMCPMC9844304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.