Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648990›Full record

Trial reportTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Feasibility of Early Evaluation for the Recurrence of Bladder Cancer after Trans-Urethral Resection: A Comparison between Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector Computed Tomography.

Yiqian Wang, Wei Zhang, Weixiong Xiao, Shaobin Chen, Yongbao Wei, Min Luo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05787938 (The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of the Urinary Bladder Wall Post Transurethral Tumor Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05787938 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Assessment of the Urinary Bladder Wall Post Transurethral Tumor Resection

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled58ConditionsUrinary Bladder CancerArmsMRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yiqian WangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9601-1892
Wei ZhangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Weixiong XiaoShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Shaobin ChenShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3951-9574
Yongbao WeiShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.
Min LuoShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3178-0076
Fujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: This study investigates the early evaluation value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in diagnosing the recurrence of bladder cancer (BC) after trans-urethral resection (TUR) alone or combined with intravesical perfusion chemotherapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 92 patients with BC who underwent MRI and MDCT after TUR. The time interval between MRI and MDCT was no more than 1 week. Tumor recurrence was recorded by two experienced radiologists who were double-blind. Recurrent patients were divided into nodular masses, irregular wall thickening and smooth wall thickening groups according to tumor morphology in cystoscopy and resected gross specimens. Inter- and intra-observer agreement was evaluated using the Kappa test. Imaging diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar’s test based on pathology. (3) Results: There were 56 relapsed and 36 non-relapsed patients. The intra-observer agreement for the imaging diagnosis was excellent (κ = 0.96 for MRI and κ = 0.91 for MDCT, both p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve of MRI was higher than that for MDCT (0.91 vs. 0.74, p < 0.001) in identifying tumor recurrence and benign treatment-related changes. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI (87.5%, 94.4% and 90.2%, respectively) were higher than those of MDCT (67.9%, 80.6% and 72.8%, respectively) in diagnosing tumor recurrence. Two observers missed 10 cases of small lesions (<1 cm) on MDCT. The accuracy of MRI (100%, 90.0% and 25.0%, respectively) was higher than that of MDCT (92.1%, 30.0% and 0%, respectively) in diagnosing nodular masses, irregular wall thickening and smooth wall thickening recurrence patterns. (4) Conclusions: Compared with MDCT, MRI had a higher accuracy in detecting BC recurrence early, especially for nodular masses and irregular wall thickening, and could better differentiate tumor recurrence from benign treatment-related changes.

Indexed as

Multidetector Computed TomographyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studiesbladder cancermagnetic resonance imagingmultidetector computed tomographyrecurrencetrans-urethral resection

Identifiers

PMID36648990
PMCPMC9844434
OpenAlexW4312100587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.