Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648981›Full record

ArticleNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2023

Contributions of Artificial Intelligence to Decision Making in Nursing: A Scoping Review Protocol.

Filipe Fernandes, Paulo Santos, Luís Sá, José Neves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Filipe FernandesInstitute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Escola Superior de Saúde do Vale do Ave-Instituto Politécnico de Saúde do Norte, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Paulo SantosInstitute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Health Research (CIIS), Escola Superior de Saúde da Cruz Vermelha Portuguesa, 1300-125 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7409-1011
Luís SáInstitute of Health Sciences, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9687-413X
José NevesResearch Unit on Artificial Intelligence & Health, Algoritmi Centre, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) techniques and methodologies for problem solving are emerging as formal tools essential to assist in nursing care. Given their potential to improve workflows and to guide decision making, several studies have been developed; however, little is known about their impact, particularly on decision making.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to map the existing research on the use of AI in decision making in nursing. With this review protocol, we aimed to map the existing research on the use of AI in nursing decision making.

methodsA scoping review was conducted following the framework proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). The search strategy was tailored to each database/repository to identify relevant studies. The contained articles were the targets of the data extraction, which was conducted by two independent researchers. In the event of discrepancies, a third researcher was consulted.

resultsThis review included quantitative, qualitative and mixed method studies. Primary studies, systematic reviews, dissertations, opinion texts and gray literature were considered according to the three steps that the JBI has defined for scoping reviews.

conclusionsThis scoping review synthesized knowledge that could help advance new scientific developments and find significant and valuable outcomes for patients, caregivers and leaders in decision making. This review was also intended to encourage the development of research lines that may be useful for the development of AI tools for decision making.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedecision makingnursingprotocol review

Identifiers

PMID36648981
PMCPMC9844284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.