Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648945›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Analysis of Rates of Completion, Delays, and Participant Recruitment in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery.

Cade Shadbolt, Elise Naufal, Samantha Bunzli, Veronique Price, Siddharth Rele, Chris Schilling, Sharmala Thuraisingam, L Stefan Lohmander, Zsolt J Balogh, Philip Clarke and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of the methodological quality of randomised trials in IBD surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Completeness of Common Data Elements for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Observational Databases.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Illuminating the landscape of high-level clinical trial opportunities in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cade ShadboltDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Elise NaufalDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Samantha BunzliSchool of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Queensland, Australia.
Veronique PriceCollege of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Siddharth ReleDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Chris SchillingDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sharmala ThuraisingamDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
L Stefan LohmanderDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Orthopaedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Zsolt J BaloghDepartment of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, Australia.
Philip ClarkeHealth Economics Research Centre, Oxford University, Oxford, England.
Peter ChoongDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Michelle DowseyDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Discontinuation and nonpublication are established sources of avoidable waste among surgical trials, but rates of delayed completion and recruiting shortfalls remain unclear. Objectives: To examine the rate of delayed completion, incomplete enrollment, and discontinuation among randomized clinical trials in surgical populations and the duration of delays and extent of recruiting shortfalls among these trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined randomized clinical trials in surgical populations registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. Analysis was conducted between October 27, 2021, and June 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the percentages of trials completed on time or with full enrollment. Delays and recruiting shortfalls were identified by comparing projected enrollment and study timeframes prespecified at the time of registration with the actual study duration and enrollment reported on completion or discontinuation. Absolute and relative differences between planned and actual trial conduct were presented for discontinued trials and those completed with delays or recruiting shortfalls. Results: In total, 2542 randomized clinical trials in surgical populations were included in the study sample, of which 370 (14.6%; 95% CI, 13.2%-15.9%) were completed both on time and with full enrollment. Approximately 1 in 5 trials (20.4%; 95% CI, 18.9%-22.0%) were completed within their planned timeframe, and 1166 trials (45.9%; 95% CI, 43.9%-47.8%) met their prespecified enrollment target. The median delay among completed trials was 12.2 months (IQR, 5.1-24.3 months) or 66.7% (IQR, 30.1%-135.8%) longer than planned. Among completed trials that did not meet their prespecified enrollment target, the median recruiting shortfall was equivalent to 31.0% (IQR, 12.7%-55.5%) of the planned study sample. A total of 546 trials (21.5%; 95% CI, 19.9%-23.1%) were discontinued. The median time to discontinuation was 26.4 months (IQR, 15.2-45.7 months), and the median recruiting shortfall among discontinued trials was equivalent to 92.7% (IQR, 65.0%-100.0%) of the trial's prespecified enrollment target. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that delayed completion, recruiting shortfalls, and untimely discontinuation were common among surgical trials. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring that investigators and funders do not overestimate the feasibility of planned trials.

Indexed as

Research PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch Subjects

Identifiers

PMID36648945
PMCPMC9857498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.