ArticleJAMA network open2023
Analysis of Rates of Completion, Delays, and Participant Recruitment in Randomized Clinical Trials in Surgery.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of the methodological quality of randomised trials in IBD surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Pooled it
- Hepatectomy Plus Chemotherapy or Chemotherapy Alone for Resectable Liver and Unresectable Lung Metastases from Colorectal Adenocarcinoma (LUNA): A Randomized Phase II Trial.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Trial
- A multicenter survey on BRAF screening for the implementation of perioperative cancer genomic medicine for resectable colorectal oligometastases.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Waiting List Policy Reform Is Required to Enable Randomised Controlled Trials of Elective Surgery.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Near-Real-Time Clinical Trial Accrual Dashboard in a National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Center: Mixed Methods Implementation Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Research on the road: Partnering with community emergency medical services to expand access to clinical trials.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Completeness of Common Data Elements for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Observational Databases.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Characteristics and potential predictors of prematurely terminated interventional clinical trials for ovarian cancer in the ClinicalTrials.gov database.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Engaging Historically Excluded Women in Health Research: Addressing Intersectional Barriers to Advance Equitable Recruitment.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025Review
- Development of a protocol complexity tool: a framework designed to stimulate discussion and simplify study design.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Recruitment rate comparison between a virtual tele-research cohort and a traditional centre-based cohort in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Observational
- Comparison of targeted web-based advertising versus traditional methods for recruiting older adults into clinical trials.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Illuminating the landscape of high-level clinical trial opportunities in the All of Us Research Program.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Internet-based enrollment of a myositis patient cohort-a national experience.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Observational
- Article
- Influences on clinical trial participation: Enhancing recruitment through a gender lens - A scoping review.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- CREST-2 Reaches A Surgical Milestone.Journal of vascular surgery · 2024Article
- In India, most principal investigators have run very few trials over the years.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Discontinuation and nonpublication are established sources of avoidable waste among surgical trials, but rates of delayed completion and recruiting shortfalls remain unclear. Objectives: To examine the rate of delayed completion, incomplete enrollment, and discontinuation among randomized clinical trials in surgical populations and the duration of delays and extent of recruiting shortfalls among these trials. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study examined randomized clinical trials in surgical populations registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014. Analysis was conducted between October 27, 2021, and June 30, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were the percentages of trials completed on time or with full enrollment. Delays and recruiting shortfalls were identified by comparing projected enrollment and study timeframes prespecified at the time of registration with the actual study duration and enrollment reported on completion or discontinuation. Absolute and relative differences between planned and actual trial conduct were presented for discontinued trials and those completed with delays or recruiting shortfalls. Results: In total, 2542 randomized clinical trials in surgical populations were included in the study sample, of which 370 (14.6%; 95% CI, 13.2%-15.9%) were completed both on time and with full enrollment. Approximately 1 in 5 trials (20.4%; 95% CI, 18.9%-22.0%) were completed within their planned timeframe, and 1166 trials (45.9%; 95% CI, 43.9%-47.8%) met their prespecified enrollment target. The median delay among completed trials was 12.2 months (IQR, 5.1-24.3 months) or 66.7% (IQR, 30.1%-135.8%) longer than planned. Among completed trials that did not meet their prespecified enrollment target, the median recruiting shortfall was equivalent to 31.0% (IQR, 12.7%-55.5%) of the planned study sample. A total of 546 trials (21.5%; 95% CI, 19.9%-23.1%) were discontinued. The median time to discontinuation was 26.4 months (IQR, 15.2-45.7 months), and the median recruiting shortfall among discontinued trials was equivalent to 92.7% (IQR, 65.0%-100.0%) of the trial's prespecified enrollment target. Conclusions and Relevance: This cross-sectional study found that delayed completion, recruiting shortfalls, and untimely discontinuation were common among surgical trials. These findings highlight the importance of ensuring that investigators and funders do not overestimate the feasibility of planned trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.