ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2023
Patterns of failure in glioblastoma multiforme following Standard (60 Gy) or Short course (40 Gy) radiation and concurrent temozolomide.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Spatial patterns of progression in reported glioblastoma cohorts after upfront chemoradiation and salvage therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of salvage reirradiation for recurrent high-grade gliomas: a retrospective analysis.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Preliminary investigation on predicting postoperative glioma recurrences based on a multiparametric radiomics model.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Significance of radiation therapy in frontal glioblastoma patients and exploration of optimal treatment modality: a real-world multiple-center study based on propensity score matching.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Recommendation for reducing the crystalline lens exposure dose by reducing imaging field width in cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy: an anthropomorphic phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Article
- Post-operative glioblastoma cancer cell distribution in the peritumoural oedema.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to analyze the patterns of failure in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) treated using chemoradiotherapy in the Standard radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions; Standard) or Short course (40 Gy/15 fractions: Short). MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety-three consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated at our hospital between April 2007 and December 2016, and 68 patients who could be followed up were included. All patients underwent surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide. We retrospectively analyzed treatment outcomes and recurrence patterns.
resultsThe median follow-up period of the surviving patients was 82.8 months (range: 46.0-158.9 months). Of the 68 patients, 58 patients (85%) had recurrences, 34 underwent the Standard and 24 Short course. The Standard course was seen in younger age groups and had a better Karnofsky performance status (KPS) than the Short course. The median survival time (MST) was 25.8 months for the Standard and 15.4 months with the Short in all cases. Standard course had significantly longer MST than the Short (p = 0.001) course. For recurrent cases only, there was no significant difference between Standard and Short courses in OS (p = 0.06). The recurrences occurred at the radiation fields alone (Standard/Short: 85%/83%), only at distant sites (Standard/Short: 12%/13%), and at both the radiation fields and distant sites (Standard/Short: 3%/4%). There was no significant difference in recurrence pattern and frequency between the two protocols (p = 0.11).
conclusionsStandard course tended to be significant in younger age groups and have a better KPS than the Short course; therefore, the Standard course has a longer OS, but the recurrence pattern of the Short course is similar to that of the Standard treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36648706What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.