Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648569›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2023

The current use of the EORTC QLQ-NMIBC24 and QLQ-BLM30 questionnaires for the assessment of health-related quality of life in bladder cancer patients: a systematic review.

E Rammant, L Fox, K Beyer, N K Aaronson, R Chaloner, S De Padova, F Liedberg, L M Wintner, K Decaestecker, V Fonteyne and 8 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

E RammantDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. elke.rammant@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-2502
L FoxTranslational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
K BeyerTranslational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
N K AaronsonDivision of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R ChalonerTranslational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
S De PadovaPsycho-Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo Per Lo Studio Dei Tumori (IRST), Dino Amadori", 47014, Meldola, Italy.
F LiedbergInstitution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
L M WintnerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
K DecaesteckerDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
V FonteyneDepartment of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
N PerdekTranslational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
H WylieTranslational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
J W F CattoAcademic Urology Unit, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
T M RippingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B HolznerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
M Van Leeuwen *Division of Psychosocial Research & Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M Van Hemelrijck *Translational Oncology & Urology Research, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
EORTC Quality of Life Group

Funding

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 2020 03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInvestigating the use of the EORTC bladder cancer (BC) modules by evaluating: (a) study contexts/designs; (b) languages/countries in which the modules were administered; (c) their acceptance by patients/investigators; and (d) their psychometric properties.

methodsA systematic review was performed with studies from 1998 until 20/10/2021 in five databases. Articles/conference abstracts using the EORTC-QLQBLM30 (muscle invasive BC) and the EORTC-QLQNMIBC24 (previously referred to as QLQ-BLS24; non-muscle invasive BC) were included. Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts/full-texts and performed data extraction.

resultsA total of 76 eligible studies were identified. Most studies included the BLM30 (n = 53), were in a urological surgery context (n = 41) and were cross-sectional (n = 35) or prospective (n = 30) in design. The BC modules were administered in 14 languages across 19 countries. Missing data were low-moderate for all non-sex related questions (< 1% to 15%). Sex-related questions had higher rates of missing data (ranging from 6.9% to 84%). Most investigators did not use all scales of the questionnaires. One validation study for the original BLS24 led to the development of the NMIBC24, which adopted a new scale structure for which good structural validity was confirmed (n = 3). Good reliability and validity was shown for the NMIBC24 module, except for malaise and bloating/flatulence scales. Psychometric evidence for BLM30 is lacking.

conclusionThese results provide insight into how the EORTC BC quality of life modules could be further improved. Current work is ongoing to update the modules and to determine if the two modules can be combined into a single questionnaire that works well in both the NMIBC and MIBC settings.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesBladder cancerEORTCHealth-related quality of lifeMeasurementQuestionnaire development

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.