Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648558›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2023

Understanding the ablation rate of Holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers. Perspectives from an in vitro study.

Mario Basulto-Martínez, Silvia Proietti, Maria Pia Pavia, Yuyi Yeow, Brian H Eisner, Guido Giusti

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. False discovery rate in laser studies.World journal of urology · 2023
    Article
  16. Innovations in Kidney Stone Removal.Research and reports in urology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mario Basulto-Martínez *Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-9078
Silvia Proietti *Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Maria Pia PaviaDepartment of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-9788
Yuyi YeowEuropean Training Center in Endourology, Milan, Italy.
Brian H EisnerDepartment of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Guido GiustiDepartment of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy. drguidogiusti@gmail.com.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITEuropean School of Oncology · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study sought to analyze the ablation rates of Holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) and thulium fiber laser (TFL) under different settings combinations. Lasering was carried out by a computed spiral pattern through a stepper motor bearing a laser fiber. BegoStones were placed inside a water container and lasered therein and the ablation rate was calculated. Different combinations were tested for ~12 Watts (W) for Ho:YAG and TFL lasers. Further 25 W combination for TFL were conducted testing higher frequencies. One-hundred-one experiments were conducted. Under ~12 W, the highest ablation rate for Ho:YAG was obtained with 40 Hz/0.3 J, and Virtual Basket™ (VB) emission mode [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40) mg/min] whereas for TFL, using 40 Hz/0.3 J, and long pulse [143.40 (137.40 - 146) mg/min]. A matched-comparison for 12 Hz/1 J settings showed that TFL outperformed Ho:YAG using medium pulse [63.30 (55.30 - 81.30) vs 132.00 (115.70 - 228.60) mg/min, p=0.016] and long pulse [62.90 (51.60 - 78.90) vs 134.70 (110.60 - 149.30) mg/min, p=0.016]. In the 40 Hz/0.3 J settings, TFL outperformed Ho:YAG (p=0.034). Nonetheless, Ho:YAG with VB's ablation rate increased [114.35 (88.30 - 126.40)], being comparable to that of TFL with medium pulse [127.5 (88.90 - 141.70)] (p=0.400). In TFL 25 W experiments, the ablation rate of 500 Hz / 0.05 J, was higher than those of 1000 Hz / 0.025 J (p=0.049). TFL ablation rate is higher than that of Ho:YAG. Moreover, the Virtual Basket™ emission mode, increased Ho:YAG ablation rates, resulting reaching similar to that of TFL in certain modalities.

Indexed as

Lasers, Solid-StateLaser TherapyLithotripsy, LaserHolmiumHumansThuliumHolmiumThuliumHolmium laserKidney stonesLithotripsyThulium fiber laserUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID36648558
PMCPMC9845154
OpenAlexW4316813229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.