ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2023
Diagnostic value of curved planar reformation of MRI for lumbosacral nerve roots in the localization of nerve roots for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the diagnostic value of curved planar reformation of MRI (MRI-CPR) and 2D MRI in determining the responsible nerve in patients with adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis (ALDS).
methodA total of 45 patients diagnosed with ALDS were included in the study. All patients underwent MRI-CPR and 2D MRI and subsequently received surgery. These two diagnostic methods were compared with the results of surgical exploration to assess nerve root compression.
resultsThe sensitivity and accuracy of MRI-CPR are higher than 2D MRI (93.8% vs 80.0%; 92.8% vs 77.7%, respectively). And the specificity of MRI-CPR is higher than 2D MRI (87.5% vs 68.8%). Besides, the PPV and NPV of MRI-CPR are higher than 2D MRI (96.8% vs 91.2%; 7.8.% vs 45.8%). The area (AUC) under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for MRI-CPR and 2D MRI was 0.74 and 0.91, respectively. The judgement was made by two independent radiologists, while the consistency tests for 2D MRI and MRI-CPR with Kappa values were 90.6% and 82.2%, respectively.
conclusionsThe clinical diagnostic value of MRI-CPR was better than 2D MRI in the determination of the responsible nerve root. Moreover, MRI-CPR sequence images can clearly show the route of lumbosacral nerve roots and their relationship with adjacent tissues. Therefore, MRI-CPR can be an important complement to conventional 2D MRI in the diagnosis of responsible nerve roots in patients with ALDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.