ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2023
Molecular age estimation based on posttranslational protein modifications in bone: why the type of bone matters.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Boiled or not boiled? - D-aspartic acid in bone proteins as proof of a burial "more teutonico"?International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Immunohistological detection of pentosidine in the epiglottis:A contribution to molecular age estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular age prediction using skull bone samples from individuals with and without signs of decomposition: a multivariate approach combining analysis of posttranslational protein modifications and DNA methylation.International journal of legal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Age-at-death estimation is of great relevance for the identification of unknown deceased individuals. In skeletonised corpses, teeth and bones are theoretically available for age estimation, but in many cases, only single bones or even only bone fragments are available for examination. In these cases, conventional morphological methods may not be applicable, and the application of molecular methods may be considered. Protein-based molecular methods based on the D-aspartic acid (D-Asp) or pentosidine (Pen) content have already been successfully applied to bone samples. However, the impact of the analysed type of bone has not yet been systematically investigated, and it is still unclear whether data from samples of one skeletal region (e.g. skull) can also be used for age estimation for samples of other regions (e.g. femur). To address this question, D-Asp and Pen were analysed in bone samples from three skeletal regions (skull, clavicle, and rib), each from the same individual. Differences between the bone types were tested by t-test, and correlation coefficients (ρ) were calculated according to Spearman. In all types of bone, an age-dependent accumulation of D-Asp and Pen was observed. However, both parameters (D-Asp and Pen) exhibited significant differences between bone samples from different anatomical regions. These differences can be explained by differences in structure and metabolism in the examined bone types and have to be addressed in age estimation based on D-Asp and Pen. In future studies, bone type-specific training and test data have to be collected, and bone type-specific models have to be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.