Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648511›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Inherited retinal disorders: a genotype-phenotype correlation in an Indian cohort and the importance of genetic testing and genetic counselling.

Chitra Gopinath, Ramya Rompicherla, Grace Priyaranjini Mathias, Rajeshwari Patil, B Poornachandra, Anand Vinekar, Thirumalesh B Mochi, Sherine Braganza, K Bhujang Shetty, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chitra GopinathGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Ramya RompicherlaGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Grace Priyaranjini MathiasGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Rajeshwari PatilGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
B PoornachandraVitreo-Retina Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, 560010, India.
Anand VinekarVitreo-Retina Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, 560010, India.
Thirumalesh B MochiVitreo-Retina Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, 560010, India.
Sherine BraganzaVitreo-Retina Services, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, 560010, India.
K Bhujang ShettyGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Govindasamy KumaramanickavelGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Anuprita GhoshGROW Research Laboratory, Narayana Nethralaya Foundation, Bangalore, 560099, India. anupritaghosh@narayananethralaya.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-7425
Narayana Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent advances in sequencing technologies have enabled radical and rapid progress in the genetic diagnosis of inherited retinal disorders (IRDs). Although the list of gene variations continues to grow, it lacks the genetic etiology of ethnic groups like South Asians. Differences in racial backgrounds and consanguinity add to genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic overlaps.

methodsThis retrospective study includes documented data from the Gen-Eye clinic from years 2014 to 2019. Medical records and pedigrees of 591 IRD patients of Indian origin and genetic reports of 117 probands were reviewed. Genotype-phenotype correlations were performed to classify as correlating, non-correlating and unsolved cases.

resultsAmong the 591 patients, we observed a higher prevalence of clinically diagnosed retinitis pigmentosa (38.9%) followed by unspecified diagnoses (28.5%). Consanguinity was reported to be high (55.6%) in this cohort. Among the variants identified in 117 probands, 36.4% of variants were pathogenic, 19.2% were likely pathogenic, and 44.4% were of uncertain significance. Among the pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants, autosomal recessive inheritance showed higher prevalence. About 35% (41/117) of cases showed genotype-phenotype correlation. Within the correlating cases, retinitis pigmentosa and Stargardt disease were predominant. Novel variants identified in RP, Stargardt, and LCA are reported here.

conclusionThis first-of-a-kind report on an Indian cohort contributes to existing knowledge and expansion of variant databases, presenting relevant and plausible novel variants. Phenotypic overlap and variability lead to a differential diagnosis and hence a clear genotype-phenotype correlation helps in precise clinical confirmation. The study also emphasizes the importance of genetic counselling and testing for personalized vision care in a tertiary eye hospital.

Indexed as

Retinal DiseasesRetinitis PigmentosaGenetic Association StudiesGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansMutationPedigreePhenotypeRetrospective StudiesGenetic counsellingGenetic testingGenotype–phenotype correlationsInherited retinal disorders (IRDs)Mendelian inheritanceNext-generation sequencing (NGS)

Identifiers

PMID36648511
OpenAlexW4316928446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.