ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023
Vitreoretinal Surgical Instrument Tracking in Three Dimensions Using Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Embodied artificial intelligence in ophthalmology.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence integration in surgery through hand and instrument tracking: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: A Systematic Review of Use and Validation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Minimization of occurrence of retained surgical items using machine learning and deep learning techniques: a review.BioData mining · 2024Review
- Applications of artificial intelligence-enabled robots and chatbots in ophthalmology: recent advances and future trends.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Chandelier-Assisted Scleral Buckling: A Literature Review.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the potential for artificial intelligence-based video analysis to determine surgical instrument characteristics when moving in the three-dimensional vitreous space. Methods: We designed and manufactured a model eye in which we recorded choreographed videos of many surgical instruments moving throughout the eye. We labeled each frame of the videos to describe the surgical tool characteristics: tool type, location, depth, and insertional laterality. We trained two different deep learning models to predict each of the tool characteristics and evaluated model performances on a subset of images. Results: The accuracy of the classification model on the training set is 84% for the x-y region, 97% for depth, 100% for instrument type, and 100% for laterality of insertion. The accuracy of the classification model on the validation dataset is 83% for the x-y region, 96% for depth, 100% for instrument type, and 100% for laterality of insertion. The close-up detection model performs at 67 frames per second, with precision for most instruments higher than 75%, achieving a mean average precision of 79.3%. Conclusions: We demonstrated that trained models can track surgical instrument movement in three-dimensional space and determine instrument depth, tip location, instrument insertional laterality, and instrument type. Model performance is nearly instantaneous and justifies further investigation into application to real-world surgical videos. Translational Relevance: Deep learning offers the potential for software-based safety feedback mechanisms during surgery or the ability to extract metrics of surgical technique that can direct research to optimize surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.