Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648390›Full record

ArticlePharmacotherapy2023

Adequacy of cefepime concentrations in the early phase of critical illness: A case for precision pharmacotherapy.

Erin F Barreto, Jack Chang, Matthew W Bjergum, Ognjen Gajic, Paul J Jannetto, Kristin C Mara, Laurie A Meade, Andrew D Rule, Kathryn J Vollmer, Marc H Scheetz and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of the DMAIC Lean Six Sigma quality improvement framework to improve beta-lactam antibiotic adequacy in the critically ill.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Erin F BarretoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0996-1487
Jack ChangDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.
Matthew W BjergumDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Ognjen GajicDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul J JannettoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kristin C MaraDivision of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Laurie A MeadeAnesthesia Clinical Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Andrew D RuleDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kathryn J VollmerRutgers Institute for Pharmaceutical Industry Fellowships, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.
Marc H ScheetzDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Chicago College of Pharmacy, Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-6130
BLOOM Study Group
Mayo Clinic · USMidwestern University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Beta-lactam individualization for critically ill patientsK23AI143882 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BARRETO, ERIN FRAZEE · 2020 to 2024
$986k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI143882NIAID NIH HHS K23AI143882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveIn critically ill patients, adequacy of early antibiotic exposure has been incompletely evaluated. This study characterized factors associated with inadequate cefepime exposure in the first 24 h of critical illness.

designProspective cohort study.

settingAcademic Medical Center. PATIENTS: Critically ill adults treated with cefepime. Patients with acute kidney injury or treated with kidney replacement therapy or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were excluded.

interventionNone. MEASUREMENTS: A nonlinear mixed-effects pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed to estimate cefepime concentrations for each patient over time. The percentage of time the free drug concentration exceeded 8 mg/L during the first 24 h of therapy was calculated (%ƒT>8; appropriate for the susceptible breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Factors predictive of low %ƒT>8 were explored with multivariable regression. MAIN

resultsIn the 100 included patients, a one-compartment PK model was developed with first-order elimination with covariates for weight and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRSCr-CysC). The median (interquartile range) %ƒT>8 for cefepime in the first 24 h of therapy based on this model was 85% (66%, 100%). Less than 100% ƒT>8 during first 24 h of therapy occurred in 70 (70%) individuals. Lower Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (p = 0.032) and higher eGFRSCr-CysC (p < 0.001) predicted a lower %ƒT>8. Central nervous system infection source was protective (i.e., associated with a higher %ƒT>8; p = 0.008).

conclusionsDuring early critical illness, cefepime concentrations were inadequate in a significant proportion of patients. Antimicrobial optimization is needed to improve the precision of pharmacotherapy in the critically ill patients.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessPseudomonas InfectionsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimeHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefepimebeta-lactamscritical careglomerular filtration ratepharmacokineticssepsis

Identifiers

PMID36648390
PMCPMC10350476
OpenAlexW4316928180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.