Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648346›Full record

ArticleRadiology2023

Deep Learning Analysis of Chest Radiographs to Triage Patients with Acute Chest Pain Syndrome.

Márton Kolossváry, Vineet K Raghu, John T Nagurney, Udo Hoffmann, Michael T Lu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning in the early diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Márton KolossváryFrom the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center (M.K., V.K.R., M.T.L.) and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114; Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); and Cleerly Health, Denver, Colo (U.H.).ORCID 0000-0002-5570-991X
Vineet K RaghuFrom the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center (M.K., V.K.R., M.T.L.) and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114; Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); and Cleerly Health, Denver, Colo (U.H.).ORCID 0000-0003-3524-3945
John T NagurneyFrom the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center (M.K., V.K.R., M.T.L.) and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114; Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); and Cleerly Health, Denver, Colo (U.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-7193-4896
Udo HoffmannFrom the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center (M.K., V.K.R., M.T.L.) and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114; Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); and Cleerly Health, Denver, Colo (U.H.).ORCID 0000-0001-5514-769X
Michael T LuFrom the Cardiovascular Imaging Research Center (M.K., V.K.R., M.T.L.) and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.T.N.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 165 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA 02114; Gottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); Physiological Controls Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary (M.K.); and Cleerly Health, Denver, Colo (U.H.).ORCID 0000-0003-4696-9610
Harvard University · USMassachusetts Mental Health Center · USObuda University · HU

Funding

Cardiac MR and CT ResearchT32HL076136 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NEILAN, TOMAS G · 2004 to 2019
$4.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain (ACP) syndrome undergo additional testing to exclude acute coronary syndrome (ACS), pulmonary embolism (PE), or aortic dissection (AD), often yielding negative results. Purpose To assess whether deep learning (DL) analysis of the initial chest radiograph may help triage patients with ACP syndrome more efficiently. Materials and Methods This retrospective study used electronic health records of patients with ACP syndrome at presentation who underwent a combination of chest radiography and additional cardiovascular or pulmonary imaging or stress tests at two hospitals (Massachusetts General Hospital [MGH], Brigham and Women's Hospital [BWH]) between January 2005 and December 2015. A DL model was trained on 23 005 patients from MGH to predict a 30-day composite end point of ACS, PE, AD, and all-cause mortality based on chest radiographs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare performance between models (model 1: age + sex; model 2: model 1 + conventional troponin or d-dimer positivity; model 3: model 2 + DL predictions) in internal and external test sets from MGH and BWH, respectively. Results At MGH, 5750 patients (mean age, 59 years ± 17 [SD]; 3329 men, 2421 women) were evaluated. Model 3, which included DL predictions, significantly improved discrimination of those with the composite outcome compared with models 2 and 1 (AUC, 0.85 [95% CI: 0.84, 0.86] vs 0.76 [95% CI: 0.74, 0.77] vs 0.62 [95% CI: 0.60 0.64], respectively;

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeDeep LearningChest PainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesTriage

Identifiers

PMID36648346
PMCPMC9885341
OpenAlexW4316927806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.