Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648241›Full record

ReviewThe Plant cell2023

Do not panic: An intron-centric guide to alternative splicing.

Ezequiel Petrillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Plant cell, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Impact of alternative splicing on Arabidopsis proteome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ezequiel PetrilloFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Fisiología, Biología, Molecular, y Celular, Universidad de Buenos Aires, 1428 Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-0025-3708

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review is an attempt to establish concepts of splicing and alternative splicing giving proper relevance to introns, the key actors in this mechanism. It might also work as a guide for those who found their favorite gene undergoes alternative splicing and could benefit from gaining a theoretical framework to understand the possible impacts of this process. This is not a thorough review of all the work in the field, but rather a critical review of some of the most relevant work done to understand the underlying mechanisms of splicing and the key questions that remain unanswered such as: What is the physiological relevance of alternative splicing? What are the functions of the different outcomes? To what extent do different alternative splicing types contribute to the proteome? Intron retention is the most frequent alternative splicing event in plants and, although scientifically neglected, it is also common in animals. This is a heterogeneous type of alternative splicing that includes different sub-types with features that have distinctive consequences in the resulting transcripts. Remarkably, intron retention can be a dead end for a transcript, but it could also be a stable intermediate whose processing is resumed upon a particular signal or change in the cell status. New sequencing technologies combined with the study of intron lariats in different conditions might help to answer key questions and could help us to understand the actual relevance of introns in gene expression regulation.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingRNA SplicingAnimalsIntrons

Identifiers

PMID36648241
PMCPMC10226583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.