Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648202›Full record

ArticleAccountability in research2024

How to embed ethics into laboratory research.

Paola Buedo, Idalina Odziemczyk, Jolanta Perek-Białas, Marcin Waligora

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accountability in research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imagining an ethics for synthetic biology.Frontiers in genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paola BuedoResearch Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1913-5728
Idalina OdziemczykDoctoral School in the Social Sciences (Sociological Sciences), Jagellonian University, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6752-064X
Jolanta Perek-BiałasInstitute of Sociology, Center for Evaluation and Public Policies Analysis, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-9565
Marcin WaligoraResearch Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1553-1416
Jagiellonian University · PL

Funding

Training Program in Research Ethics in the AmericasR25TW001605 · FIC · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI LUNA, FLORENCIA · 2000 to 2025
$6.7M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW001605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health-related innovation in biotechnology requires anticipating potential bioethical implications. In this article, we present a strategy to embed ethics in a group of early-stage researchers performing research in gene therapy and regenerative medicine in the laboratory phase. We conducted a series of focus group meetings with early-stage researchers who work in biotechnology laboratories. The objective was to reflect on the bioethical challenges of their own work and to promote the integration of research ethics with laboratory practice. The activity was assessed with questionnaires completed by the researchers before and after the meetings, and the analyses of the focus groups' content. As a result of the focus group series, all participants changed their perspectives about ethical issues regarding their planned research, developed the ability to reflect and debate on research ethics and had increased awareness of ethical issues in their own research activities. Half of them made changes in their research work. The study provides a concrete strategy to embed ethics and to strengthen responsibility in laboratory research. It is a strategy that allows to perform ethics reflection "on site" and in "real time" and complements the classic strategy of ethics assessment of the research protocol before starting the research procedure.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchFocus GroupsBiomedical ResearchBiotechnologyFemaleGenetic TherapyHumansLaboratoriesMaleRegenerative MedicineResearch PersonnelSurveys and Questionnairesbiomedical researchBiotechnologyethicsfocus groupsresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID36648202
PMCPMC10835673
OpenAlexW4316928031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.