Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648151›Full record

ReviewJournal of applied microbiology2022

The rhizosphere microbiome: Plant-microbial interactions for resource acquisition.

Hugo A Pantigoso, Derek Newberger, Jorge M Vivanco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of applied microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hugo A PantigosoCenter for Root and Rhizosphere Biology, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523-1173 United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7121-7253
Derek NewbergerCenter for Root and Rhizosphere Biology, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523-1173 United States.
Jorge M VivancoCenter for Root and Rhizosphere Biology, Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523-1173 United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While horticulture tools and methods have been extensively developed to improve the management of crops, systems to harness the rhizosphere microbiome to benefit plant crops are still in development. Plants and microbes have been coevolving for several millennia, conferring fitness advantages that expand the plant's own genetic potential. These beneficial associations allow the plants to cope with abiotic stresses such as nutrient deficiency across a wide range of soils and growing conditions. Plants achieve these benefits by selectively recruiting microbes using root exudates, positively impacting their nutrition, health and overall productivity. Advanced knowledge of the interplay between root exudates and microbiome alteration in response to plant nutrient status, and the underlying mechanisms there of, will allow the development of technologies to increase crop yield. This review summarizes current knowledge and perspectives on plant-microbial interactions for resource acquisition and discusses promising advances for manipulating rhizosphere microbiomes and root exudation.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaRhizosphereCrops, AgriculturalMicrobial InteractionsPlant RootsSoilSoil MicrobiologySoilmicrobiomenutrientplant growth promoting rhizobacteriarhizosphereroot exudatessignallingsoil

Identifiers

PMID36648151
PMCPMC9796772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.