Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36648027›Full record

ArticleRenal failure2023

Clinical value of the renal pathologic scoring system in complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy.

Fei-Fei Chen, Xiao-Juan Yu, Hui Wang, Xu Zhang, Ying Tan, Zhen Qu, Su-Xia Wang, Feng Yu, Min Chen, Ming-Hui Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Renal failure, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Fei-Fei ChenRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Xiao-Juan YuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Hui WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Xu ZhangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Ying TanRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Zhen QuDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Su-Xia WangRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Feng YuRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Min ChenRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Ming-Hui ZhaoRenal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Renal Pathology Center, Institute of Nephrology, Peking University First Hospital; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Beijing, PR China.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNPeking University International Hospital · CNKing University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was initiated to establish a renal thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) scoring system based on clinical needs and investigate its predictive value for patients' long-term outcomes.

methodsKidney biopsy-proven Complement-mediated TMA (C-TMA) patients from January 2000 to December 2017 in Peking University First Hospital were retrospectively studied. Both acute and chronic TMA-related lesions, including 15 pathologic indices, were semiquantitatively scored. The interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and correlation between the pathologic indices and clinical parameters were analyzed. Furthermore, the patients were divided into 2 groups by dialysis use at baseline, and the association of these pathologic indices with their prognostic outcomes was assessed between the two groups.

resultsNinety-two patients with renal biopsy-proven C-TMA were enrolled. All fifteen included pathology indices showed good or moderate interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility and correlated well with several clinical parameters. Several clinicopathological indices were worse in the dialysis group than in the nondialysis group, such as serum creatinine, hemoglobin, platelet count, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Moreover, morphologic features in the dialysis group presented with more severe vascular lesions. Interstitial fibrosis and chronic tubulointerstitial lesions were related to a trend of high risk of continuous dialysis in the dialysis group. Based on univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis, more severe glomerular lesions, including glomerular mesangiolysis, glomerular basement membrane double contours and glomerular mesangial proliferation, were identified as risk factors predicting worse prognosis.

conclusionsOur renal C-TMA semiquantitative scoring system is reliable with good reproducibility and prognostic value in clinical practice, which needs further validation.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesThrombotic MicroangiopathiesHumansPrognosisRenal DialysisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesC-TMAkidneymicroangiopathypathologyTMA

Identifiers

PMID36648027
PMCPMC9848373
OpenAlexW4316928438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.