Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647808›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic surgery2023

Undetected Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review.

Yubo Liu, Chao Li, Zheng Cao, Xin Wang, Jiaxin Wen, Hangyu Ping, Xiangpeng Kong, Wei Chai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yubo LiuSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-9628
Chao LiSenior Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zheng CaoSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3129-7113
Xin WangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Jiaxin WenSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Hangyu PingSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Xiangpeng KongSenior Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ChaiSenior Department of Orthopaedics, The Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8781-9745
Nankai University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

2022 Major Scientific Problems And Medical Technology Problems Project of China Medicine Education Association 2022KTZ006Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation M22016Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project Z221100003522014Clinical Application-oriented Medical Innovation Foundation of the National Clinical Research Center for Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation and Jiangsu China-Israel Industrial Technical Research Institute 2021-NCRC-CXJJ-ZH-01National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2401303National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2401304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePeriprosthetic fracture in total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be catastrophic, and early detection and appropriate management are vital to the overall prognosis. This study aimed to describe and summarize the features of undetected intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IPFFs) in primary THA patients and treatment measures and to review the relevant literature.

methodsWe reviewed a total of 6350 primary THAs performed at our institution between January 2013 and December 2020 and screened all IPFFs. Of 138 IPFFs, 24 were undetected and met the inclusion criteria. We recorded and compared basic patient and operative information and measured some parameters to evaluate canal morphologies based on preoperative radiographs. We also compared fracture line characteristics using postoperative radiographs to summarize the features of intraoperative fractures and propose treatment strategies. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality of the variable distributions. Measured parameters in all groups were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and compared using Dunnett's test. The χ

resultsAmong the 24 hips, there was no significant difference in patient demographics, basic operative information or morphology. The incidence of IPFFs in primary THA patients was 2.17%, and up to 17.4% of IPFFs were undetected until postoperative fluoroscopy. The incidence of undetected IPFFs among all primary THA patients was 0.38% and varied by stem type, with the highest incidence in femurs with either anatomical (1.04%, 4/385) or modular stems (0.90%, 9/1003). Femurs with anatomical stems had a higher reoperation rate. The distal periprosthetic (Gruen zone 4) fracture line of femurs with tapered stems was more prone to involve the medial or lateral bone cortex, which could cause instability.

conclusionAn undetected IPFF is most likely in femurs fitted with a prosthesis of an inappropriate size or type. Anatomical stems will most likely cause unstable fractures; thus, it is recommended to use them with caution and note the possibility of medial distal femoral fracture. Improper modular stem type or size selection results in longitudinal fractures of the distal femur, and prophylactic cerclage wire binding is recommended in dysplastic hips. Incorrect use of tapered stems in well-ossified femurs may cause distal femoral fractures involving the medial or lateral bone cortex. Intraoperative fluoroscopy after implantation may help detect hidden fractures.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipFemoral FracturesFemoral Fractures, DistalHip ProsthesisPeriprosthetic FracturesFemurHumansProsthesis DesignReoperationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesCase SeriesFemoral StemsFracture LinesIntraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral FractureRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID36647808
PMCPMC9977600
OpenAlexW4316928648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.