ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023
A "middle-out approach" for the prediction of human drug disposition from preclinical data using simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.
Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Formalizing method choice: a data-driven selection of mechanistic models for predicting human heart drug partitioning.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2026Article
- Age-Driven Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Empagliflozin: Toward Precision Dosing in Youth.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Article
- The Evolving Role of In Vitro-In Vivo Correlation in Model-Informed Drug Development: A Multi-Stakeholder Perspective.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- A "middle-out approach" for the prediction of human drug disposition from preclinical data using simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Article
- Investigation of simplified physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models in rat and human.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Simplified physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models using estimated tissue-to-unbound plasma partition coefficients (Kpus) were previously investigated by fitting them to in vivo pharmacokinetic (PK) data. After optimization with preclinical data, the performance of these models for extrapolation of distribution kinetics to human were evaluated to determine the best approach for the prediction of human drug disposition and volume of distribution (Vss) using PBPK modeling. Three lipophilic bases were tested (diazepam, midazolam, and basmisanil) for which intravenous PK data were available in rat, monkey, and human. The models with Kpu scalars using k-means clustering were generally the best for fitting data in the preclinical species and gave plausible Kpu values. Extrapolations of plasma concentrations for diazepam and midazolam using these models and parameters obtained were consistent with the observed clinical data. For diazepam and midazolam, the human predictions of Vss after optimization in rats and monkeys were better compared with the Vss estimated from the traditional PBPK modeling approach (varying from 1.1 to 3.1 vs. 3.7-fold error). For basmisanil, the sparse preclinical data available could have affected the model performance for fitting and the subsequent extrapolation to human. Overall, this work provides a rational strategy to predict human drug distribution using preclinical PK data within the PBPK modeling strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.