Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647755›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Evaluation of changes to work patterns in multidisciplinary cancer team meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A national mixed-method survey study.

Tayana Soukup, David Winters, Kia-Chong Chua, Philip Rowland, Jacqueline Moneke, Ted A Skolarus, Rasiah Bharathan, Leanne Harling, Anish Bali, Viren Asher and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Tayana SoukupInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0203-7264
David WintersDepartment of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kia-Chong ChuaInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
Philip RowlandDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jacqueline MonekeDepartment of Urology, Cambridge University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ted A SkolarusDow Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Center for Clinical Management Research, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Rasiah BharathanUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Leanne HarlingDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anish BaliGynaecology Cancer Centre, University Hospitals of Derby & Burton, Derby, UK.
Viren AsherGynaecology Cancer Centre, University Hospitals of Derby & Burton, Derby, UK.
Tasha GandamihardjaChelmsford Breast Unit, Broomfield Hospital, Chelmsford, UK.
Nick SevdalisInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London, London, UK.
James S A GreenDepartment of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Benjamin W LambDepartment of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
King's College London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust · GBBroomfield Hospital · GBUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is not well understood the overall changes that multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have had to make in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, nor the impact that such changes, in addition to the other challenges faced by MDTs, have had on decision-making, communication, or participation in the context of MDT meetings specifically.

methodsThis was a mixed method, prospective cross-sectional survey study taking place in the United Kingdom between September 2020 and August 2021.

resultsThe participants were 423 MDT members. Qualitative findings revealed hybrid working and possibility of virtual attendance as the change introduced because of COVID-19 that MDTs would like to maintain. However, IT-related issues, slower meetings, longer lists and delays were identified as common with improving of the IT infrastructure necessary going forward. In contrast, virtual meetings and increased attendance/availability of clinicians were highlighted as the positive outcomes resulting from the change. Quantitative findings showed significant improvement from before COVID-19 for MDT meeting organisation and logistics (M = 45, SD = 20) compared to the access (M = 50, SD = 12, t(390) = 5.028, p = 0.001), case discussions (M = 50, SD = 14, t(373) = -5.104, p = 0.001), and patient representation (M = 50, SD = 12, t(382) = -4.537, p = 0.001) at MDT meetings. DISCUSSION: Our study explored the perception of change since COVID-19 among cancer MDTs using mixed methods. While hybrid working was preferred, challenges exist. Significant improvements in the meeting organisation and logistics were reported. Although we found no significant perceived worsening across the four domains investigated, there was an indication in this direction for the case discussions warranting further 'live' assessments of MDT meetings.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPatient Care TeamProspective Studiescancercancer multidisciplinary team meetingsdecision-makingmultidisciplinary teams

Identifiers

PMID36647755
PMCPMC10134365
OpenAlexW4316928301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.