Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647546›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2023

Protective Efficiency Comparison of Direct and Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Ischemia Reperfusion Injury of the Liver in Patients Undergoing Partial Hepatectomy.

Erliang Kong, Chang Yuan, Yongchang Li, Tian Tian, Yan He, Xudong Feng

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Erliang Kong *Department of Anesthesiology, The 988th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhengzhou, Henan 450042, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4036-6328
Chang Yuan *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan 450052, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4200-7863
Yongchang Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7055-9027
Tian TianDepartment of Anesthesiology, The 988th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhengzhou, Henan 450042, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-4997
Yan HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Fuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000 Fujian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1839-6894
Xudong FengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The 988th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Zhengzhou, Henan 450042, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-7913
People's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNShanghai Changzheng Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Ischemia reperfusion injury greatly damages liver function and deteriorates the prognosis of patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. This study is to compare the protective efficiency of direct and remote ischemic preconditioning (DIPC and RIPC) on ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. Methods: 90 patients scheduled for partial hepatectomy were enrolled and randomly divided into control ( Results: 10 patients were excluded from the study, and finally, the eligible patients in three groups were 27, 28, and 25, separately. No significant differences were observed in baseline and surgery characteristics among the three groups. SBP and DBP were significantly higher after hepatic portal vein occlusion while they were significantly lower after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group, SBP and DBP were of great fluctuation at different time points in the control group while they showed much more stabilization in the DIPC and RIPC groups. ALT, AST, and TBIL were significantly decreased on days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery, and ICG R15 was significantly decreased while ICG K value and EHBF were significantly increased on day 1 after surgery in the DIPC and RIPC groups compared with that in the control group. Moreover, antioxidant enzyme SOD was increased, and inflammatory factors TNF- Conclusion: DIPC and RIPC both alleviated ischemia reperfusion injury of the liver and reduced perioperative complications with similar protective efficiency in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy.

Indexed as

Ischemic PreconditioningLiver DiseasesReperfusion InjuryHepatectomyHumans

Identifiers

PMID36647546
PMCPMC9840547
OpenAlexW4313700718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.