ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Inferior pulmonary ligament approach and/or interlobar fissure approach for posterior and/or lateral basal segment resection: a case-series of 31 patients.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical application of three-dimensional reconstruction in anatomical analysis of the right anterior, lateral, and posterior basal segments (RS8, RS9, and RS10) for RS9 segmentectomy.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic posterior and/ or lateral basal segment resection is a major difficult segmentectomy for thoracic surgeons, because of its high surgical difficulty and high incidence of postoperative complications. Here we describe the surgical procedure and techniques of the transpulmonary ligament approach and/or interlobar fissure approach for the thoracoscopic posterior and/or lateral basal segment resection. Methods: The clinical data of 31 patients who underwent thoracoscopic posterior and/or lateral basal segment resection from January 2020 to June 2022 were included. All patients underwent posterior and/or lateral basal segment resection via the inferior pulmonary ligament and/or interlobar fissure approach. Follow-up was continued to September 2022. Results: All patients including 7 males and 24 females, with a median age of 51 [31-62] years, completed the operation successfully. One patient was converted to lobectomy due to insufficient margins intraoperatively. Two patients were treated using the interlobar fissure approach, 25 patients were treated via the inferior pulmonary ligament approach, and four patients were treated by employing both methods. Also, 20 patients had a single lesion and 1 patient had two lesions. Eleven patients underwent surgical resections on other lesions when posterior and/or lateral basal segment lesions resected. The median operation time was 120 [50-290] minutes, the median intraoperative blood loss was 50 [10-100] mL, the median postoperative drainage time was 4 [2-10] days, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 4 [2-13] days. There was no perioperative death. Postoperative complications included five cases of persistent air leakage longer than 5 days (7, 7, 8, 9, and 10 days), and one patient developed a pulmonary infection and abnormal liver function after the operation. The median maximum diameter of the lesion was 0.8 [0.2-1.5] cm, lymph nodes were resected in a median of 8 [4-15] case. Conclusions: The approach of the inferior pulmonary ligament to resect posterior and/or the lateral basal segment can optimize the surgical procedure. The surgical trauma and postoperative complications are reduced, which is worthy of popularization and application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.