Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647492›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2022

Regional anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a narrative review of indications and clinical considerations.

Gokhan Sertcakacilar, Yasin Tire, Marta Kelava, Harsha K Nair, Roberta O C Lawin-O'Brien, Alparslan Turan, Kurt Ruetzler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06636578 (Dexmedetomidine Ropivacaine Versus Plain Ropivacaine in Bilateral Pectoralis Nerve), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06636578 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Dexmedetomidine Ropivacaine Versus Plain Ropivacaine in Bilateral Pectoralis Nerve (PECS) Block for Fast Tracking and Postoperative Analgesia in Open Heart Surgery Through Midline Sternotomy. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFayoum UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsAnalgesiaArmsdexmedetomidine, ropivacaine, fentanyl
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of erector spinae plane block on postoperative recovery quality in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pain Management Strategies for Chronic Pain after Thoracic Surgery: From Pharmacological Therapy to Regenerative Approaches.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Gokhan SertcakacilarDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Yasin TireDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Marta KelavaDepartment of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Harsha K NairDepartment of General Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Roberta O C Lawin-O'BrienHighgate School, London, UK.
Alparslan TuranDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Kurt RuetzlerDepartment of Outcomes Research, Anesthesiology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USKonya Food and Agriculture University · TROutcomes Research Consortium · USSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Surgical procedures involving incisions of the chest wall regularly pose challenges for intra- and postoperative analgesia. For many decades, opioids have been widely administered to target both, acute and subsequent chronic incisional pain. Opioids are potent and highly addictive drugs that can provide sufficient pain relief, but simultaneously cause unwanted effects ranging from nausea, vomiting and constipation to respiratory depression, sedation and even death. Multimodal analgesia consists of the administration of two or more medications or analgesia techniques that act by different mechanisms for providing analgesia. Thus, multimodal analgesia aims to improve pain relief while reducing opioid requirements and opioid-related side effects. Regional anesthesia techniques are an important component of this approach. Methods: For this narrative review, authors summarized currently used regional anesthesia techniques and performed an extensive literature search to summarize specific current evidence. For this, related articles from January 1985 to March 2022 were taken from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases. Terms such as "pectoral nerve blocks", "serratus plane block", "erector spinae plane block" belonging to blocks used in thoracic surgery were searched in different combinations. Key Content and Findings: Potential advantages of regional anesthesia as part of multimodal analgesia regiments are reduced surgical stress response, improved analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, reduced risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and early mobilization. Potential disadvantages include the possibility of bleeding related to regional anesthesia procedure (particularly epidural hematoma), dural puncture with subsequent dural headache, systemic hypotension, urine retention, allergic reactions, local anesthetic toxicity, injuries to organs including pneumothorax, and a relatively high failure especially with continuous techniques. Conclusions: This narrative review summarizes regional anesthetic techniques, specific indications, and clinical considerations for patients undergoing thoracic surgery, with evidence from studies performed. However, there is a need for more studies comparing new block methods with standard methods so that clinical applications can increase patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

fascial plane blocksregional anesthesiathoracic surgerythoracic wall nerve blocksUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID36647492
PMCPMC9840019
OpenAlexW4313378966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.