ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Video-based curriculum improves resident participation during robot-assisted surgery.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Expert consensus on best content of a robotic surgical curriculum: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Cognitive ergonomics and robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical videos allow residents to prepare for the operating room. We sought to determine if a video-based curriculum improves resident participation during robot-assisted surgery. Methods: We created a video-based surgical curriculum by providing residents with narrated videos of similar cases before participating in the operating room. We obtained information about the average monthly viewings of cases and the total monthly time spent viewing cases. We surveyed the residents after a year of the program. In addition, we used software to track the amount of time the resident spent controlling the robot during the case. We assessed the amount of time the resident had control of the robot for their first robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair of the month with a dual console for 13 months before and after implementing the curriculum. Results: A total of 43 videos were made for the video-based curriculum. On average, 37 videos were viewed during the month, with residents spending 16 hours per month viewing the videos. Twenty residents (83%) completed the survey. 90% of the residents often or always watched the video before surgery. All residents felt videos were better than books to prepare for surgery (100%). Residents thought that the videos helped them prepare for surgery: understanding surgical anatomy (95%), the cognitive aspect of the surgery (95%), and the technical part of surgery (100%). Analysis of the resident console time of the first robot-assisted hiatal hernia repair of the month showed a significant increase in the amount of time the resident participated in the case from 11% to 48% (P<0.001). Conclusions: Video-based curriculum was a valuable tool for residents to prepare for surgical cases. Video-based curriculum significantly increases resident participation during robot-assisted thoracic surgery. Adopting this strategy will improve the resident training experience. A video-based curriculum should be adopted in surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.