ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Off-label use of intrabronchial valves for persistent air leak is safe and effective: a retrospective case analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transforming pulmonary care with applications of endobronchial valves beyond emphysema: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Review
- An 8-year-old female with a spontaneous tension pneumothorax leading to cardiac arrest complicated by recurrent bronchopleural fistulas requiring endobronchial valves: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Drainology: Leveraging research in chest-drain management to enhance recovery after cardiothoracic surgery.JTCVS techniques · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent air leak (PAL) is a challenging clinical problem associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity. Historically, treatment options were limited to thoracostomy tube drainage, pleurodesis, and surgical repair. The development of one-way airway valves has represented a paradigm shift in PAL management. We present our experience using intrabronchial valves (IBVs) for PAL management looking at both on-label (post-thoracic surgery) and off-label (all other) indications. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of our single-center experience. Data collected included demographics, primary pathology leading to PAL, comorbidities, time to chest tube removal, complications, mortality, need for any additional procedure, and time to IBV removal. Results: During the study period, 15 patients underwent IBV insertion for PAL. The on-label cohort contained three patients (post lobectomy or segmentectomy). The off-label cohort had 12 patients (6 empyema, 4 secondary spontaneous pneumothorax, 1 penetrating trauma, and 1 post percutaneous lung nodule biopsy). In the on-label cohort, chest tube was removed after a mean duration of 4.0±1.0 days for all patients. In the off-label cohort, 83.3% (10/12) had chest tube removal 16.2±5.7 days (P=0.396) after IBV placement. One patient developed hypoxic respiratory failure shortly after IBV insertion, necessitating removal of 2 out of 5 valves. Conclusions: IBVs are a minimally invasive, well tolerated treatment modality for patients with PAL and a viable alternative to invasive surgical interventions. Procedure or valve-related complications are uncommon. Valves can be removed and do not preclude surgical intervention. Updated guidelines are necessary to formalize PAL management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.