Comparison of oncological outcomes between trisegmentectomy and lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in the left upper division.

Background: The left upper lobe is one of the largest lobes in the lungs and is divided into two anatomical units: the upper division (segments 1+2 and segment 3) and lingula (segments 4 and 5). This anatomical classification is similar to that used for the right upper and middle lobes. Although bilobectomy is not recommended for right upper or middle lobe tumors close to the interlobar plane, lobectomy is often performed for tumors located close to the intersegmental plane in the left upper division. To aid in establishing trisegmentectomy as a standard treatment for clinical N0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the left upper lobe, we aimed to re-assess its feasibility based on oncological outcomes according to tumor location. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with clinical N0 NSCLC in the left upper division who underwent left upper lobectomy or trisegmentectomy between April 2006 and December 2020. After propensity score matching, oncological outcomes were compared between the trisegmentectomy and lobectomy groups. To verify whether trisegmentectomy was indicated regardless of tumor distance from the intersegmental plane, we compared the recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates following trisegmentectomy between patients with tumors ≤20 and >20 mm from the intersegmental plane. Results: After propensity score matching, 46 patients were included in each group. There was no significant difference in the 5-year RFS rate between the lobectomy and trisegmentectomy groups (75.5% Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that oncological outcomes (i.e., RFS rates) following trisegmentectomy for clinical N0 NSCLC in the left upper division are not significantly inferior to those following lobectomy, even if the tumor is located close to the intersegmental plane.