Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647368›Full record

ArticleMaterials and structures2023

Multiscale micromechanics modeling of plant fibers: upscaling of stiffness and elastic limits from cellulose nanofibrils to technical fibers.

Markus Königsberger, Markus Lukacevic, Josef Füssl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials and structures, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Markus KönigsbergerInstitute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13/202, 1040 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-1445-206X
Markus LukacevicInstitute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13/202, 1040 Vienna, Austria.
Josef FüsslInstitute for Mechanics of Materials and Structures, TU Wien, Karlsplatz 13/202, 1040 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 1093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical properties of natural fibers, as used to produce sustainable biocomposites, vary significantly-both among different plant species and also within a single species. All plants, however, share a common microstructural fingerprint. They are built up by only a handful of constituents, most importantly cellulose. Through continuum micromechanics multiscale modeling, the mechanical behavior of cellulose nanofibrils is herein upscaled to the technical fiber level, considering 26 different commonly used plants. Model-predicted stiffness and elastic limit bounds, respectively, frame published experimental ones. This validates the model and corroborates that plant-specific physicochemical properties, such as microfibril angle and cellulose content, govern the mechanical fiber performance.

Indexed as

BiocompositeElasticityMicro-mechanicsNatural fibersStrength

Identifiers

PMID36647368
PMCPMC9837021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.