ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023
Improved bias and reproducibility of coronary artery calcification features using deconvolution.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detection of arterial remodeling using epicardial adipose tissue assessment from CT calcium scoring scan.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing cardiovascular risk prediction through AI-enabled calcium-omics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease using coronary calcification and epicardial adipose tissue assessments from CT calcium scoring scans.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Our long-range goal is to improve whole-heart CT calcium scores by extracting quantitative features from individual calcifications. Here, we perform deconvolution to improve bias/reproducibility of small calcification assessments, which can be degraded at the normal CT calcium score image resolution. Approach: We analyzed features of individual calcifications on repeated standard (2.5 mm) and thin (1.25 mm) slice scans from QRM-Cardio phantom, cadaver hearts, and CARDIA study participants. Preprocessing to improve the resolution involved of Lucy-Richardson deconvolution with a measured point spread function (PSF) or three-dimensional blind deconvolution in which the PSF was iteratively optimized on high detail structures such as calcifications in images. Results: Using QRM with inserts having known mg-calcium, we determined that both blind and conventional deconvolution improved mass measurements nearly equally well on standard images. Further, deconvolved thin images gave an excellent recovery of actual mass scores, suggesting that such processing could be our gold standard. For CARDIA images, blind deconvolution greatly improved results on standard slices. Bias across 33 calcifications (without, with deconvolution) was (23%, 9%), (18%, 1%), and ( Conclusions: Deconvolution improves bias and reproducibility of multiple features extracted from individual calcifications in CT calcium score exams. Blind deconvolution is useful for improving feature assessments of coronary calcification in archived datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.