ArticleHeliyon2023
ANFIS and ANN models to predict heliostat tracking errors.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The efficiency and performance of solar tower power are greatly influenced by the heliostats field. To ensure accurate tracking of reflectors often requires an evaluation of the beam reflected positions. This operation is costly time-consuming due to the number of heliostats. It is also necessary to set up a fast and less expensive method able to evaluate tracking heliostat. In this paper, prediction models based on the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) were applied to estimate rapidly and accurately heliostat error tracking. The modeling is based on the experimental data of seven different days. The input parameters are time and day number and the output is the beam reflected position following the altitude and azimuth axes. Both techniques have been able to predict the beam reflected position. A comparison of results showed that intelligent methods recorded better performance than conventional model based on geometric errors. For ANFIS model, coefficients of correlation (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.