ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2023
Long Short-Term Memory-Based Deep Learning Models for Screening Parkinson's Disease Using Sequential Diagnostic Codes.
Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Machine learning integration of serial blood biomarkers enhances cognitive decline prediction in early Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Incidence of anxiety disorders following Parkinson's disease: a population-based cohort study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- The gut-brain axis in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases: a comparative perspective.Frontiers in microbiomes · 2026Review
- Digital Healthcare in Future Medicine: From Research to Clinical Practice in Neurology.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Exosome-Machine Learning Integration in Biomedicine: Advancing Diagnosis and Biomarker Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Predicting Parkinson's Disease Using a Deep-Learning Algorithm to Analyze Prodromal Medical and Prescription Data.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- The Potential of ChatGPT to Transform Healthcare and Address Ethical Challenges in Artificial Intelligence-Driven Medicine.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
- The Intersection of Technology and Humanity: Exploring the Ethics and Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeIt is challenging to detect Parkinson's disease (PD) in its early stages, which has prompted researchers to develop techniques based on machine learning methods for detecting PD. However, previous studies did not fully incorporate the slow progression of PD over a long period of time nor consider that its symptoms occur in a time-sequential manner. Contributing to the literature on PD, which has relied heavily on cross-sectional data, this study aimed to develop a method for detecting PD early that can process time-series information using the long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithm.
methodsWe sampled 926 patients with PD and 9,260 subjects without PD using medical-claims data. The LSTM algorithm was tested using diagnostic histories, which contained the diagnostic codes and their respective time information. We compared the prediction power of the 12-month diagnostic codes under two different settings over the 4 years prior to the first PD diagnosis.
resultsThe model that was trained using the most-recent 12-month diagnostic codes had the best performance, with an accuracy of 94.25%, a sensitivity of 82.91%, and a specificity of 95.26%. The other three models (12-month codes from 2, 3, and 4 years prior) were found to have comparable performances, with accuracies of 92.27%, 91.86%, and 91.81%, respectively. The areas under the curve from our data settings ranged from 0.839 to 0.923.
conclusionsWe explored the possibility that PD specialists could benefit from our proposed machine learning method as an early detection method for PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.