Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647227›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2023

Hearing Preservation, Facial Nerve Dysfunction, and Tumor Control in Small Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery Versus Microsurgery.

Renindra Ananda Aman, Don Augusto Alexandro Petonengan, Muhammad Hafif, Fabianto Santoso

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Long-Term Hearing Outcome For Vestibular Schwannomas After Microsurgery And Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Renindra Ananda AmanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. reninananda.aman@ui.ac.id.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-6256
Don Augusto Alexandro PetonenganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9666-8934
Muhammad HafifDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-9975
Fabianto SantosoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4370-2227
Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat Nasional Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeVestibular schwannoma (VS) is the most common type of tumor found in the cerebellopontine angle that accounts for 8% of all intracranial tumors. VS management is currently a challenge due to the unpredictable nature of the tumor. Few studies have compared the results and complications of various therapeutic approaches to VS. Therefore, as a treatment option for VSs smaller than 25 mm, we conducted a systematic review to compare Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) with conventional surgery.

methodsLiterature searches were conducted of four online databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect) using the following keyword search: ("vestibular schwannoma" OR "acoustic neuroma") AND ("gamma knife" OR "gamma knife radiosurgery") AND ("resection" OR "open surgery") AND ("hearing preservation" OR "facial nerve" OR "tumor growth").

resultsWe identified six retrospective cohort studies, five of which were of fair-to-good quality. All studies showed that GKRS was superior to surgery in hearing preservation. Two studies indicated that surgery was superior to GKRS in maintaining tumor control, one indicated that GKRS was superior, and the remainder indicated that there was no significant difference in maintaining tumor control between GKRS and microsurgery.

conclusionsBased on the three outcomes chosen for this review, GKRS was superior to microsurgery in small VS.

Indexed as

microsurgeryradiosurgeryvestibular schwannoma

Identifiers

PMID36647227
PMCPMC10169925
OpenAlexW4316927988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.