ArticleThe Kobe journal of medical sciences2022
Accuracy of a Professional Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in The Kobe journal of medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary effect on glucose homeostasis is modulated by a loss-of-function variant in the sucrase-isomaltase gene: a randomised, dietary crossover intervention in Inuit.Diabetologia · 2026Trial
- Efficacy of telemedicine on glycaemic control in nursing home residents with type 2 diabetes on basal-bolus insulin therapy: A randomised controlled trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Trial
- The Impact of Interfering Substances on Continuous Glucose Monitors Part 3: A Review of Non-Labeled Substances Influencing Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Review
- Observational
- Association of Physical Activity Patterns With Nocturnal Hypoglycemia Events in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
- Effects of Physiological-Scale Variation in Cations, pH, and Temperature on the Calibration of Electrochemical Aptamer-Based Sensors.ACS sensors · 2024Article
- Observational
- Clinical Performance Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Scoping Review and Recommendations for Reporting.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices, which continuously measure glucose concentration in subcutaneous interstitial fluid for comprehensive monitoring of blood glucose profile, only FreeStyle Libre Pro® (Abbott Diabetes Care) is currently available in Japan as a professional system. FreeStyle Libre Pro® is easy to use because it does not require calibration by self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), but information on its accuracy has been insufficient. To evaluate the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro®, we have now compared blood glucose levels determined by this device with those measured by SMBG in 40 individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) for FreeStyle Libre Pro® measurements compared with SMBG measurements was calculated as an index of CGM accuracy. Overall blood glucose values measured by SMBG were 167.0 ± 60.1 mg/dL, and those determined by FreeStyle Libre Pro® were 155.0 ± 60.7 mg/dL, with this difference being statistically significant. The MARD for FreeStyle Libre Pro® relative to SMBG was 12.7 ± 9.3%. It was substantially higher in 2 of the 40 patients, at 49.2% and 47.5%, than in the other 38 individuals. MARD values did not differ significantly between before and 2 h after meals. However, the MARD was significantly higher for SMBG values of <100 mg/dL than for those of ≥250 mg/dL. Our results thus indicate that the measurement accuracy of FreeStyle Libre Pro® is relatively good, but that some cases in which values determined by the device deviate from SMBG values require caution in interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36647081PMC10117624W4316928668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.