SynthesisJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2023
Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comparative meta-analysis of stress shielding between short-stem and conventional femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Atomic-scale ordering enables intrinsic bioactivity and rapid osseointegration in medium-entropy alloys.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Article
- [A simulation study on the differences in compressive mechanical properties of Voronoi porous structures with two strut-diameter morphologies].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Digital Design of Kurtosis-Controlled Ti-6Al-4V Lattices for Patient-Specific Orthopedic Implants: A Computational Framework.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Mechano-Genomic Frontier: Orchestrating Nuclear Deformation for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Biomedical titanium-tantalum alloys for orthopedic implant applications: From manufacturing to biological performance.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Toward next-generation hip implants: From failure mechanisms to translational design.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid)-Based Systems in Implantology: Advances in Biomaterial Design, Drug Delivery, and Tissue Regeneration.Polymers · 2026Review
- Biomechanical evaluation of 3D-printed porous lattice versus solid mandibular implants: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Design and Performance Evaluation of TPMS-Based Dual-Layer Gradient Porous Structures for Bone Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Magnesium ion implantation enhances the osseointegration and vascularization of 3D-Printed CoCrMo alloy scaffolds for load-bearing orthopedic applications.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- A review of 3D printed medical implant design.3D printing in medicine · 2026Article
- Flexible Polymer-Based Electronics for Human Health Monitoring: A Safety-Level-Oriented Review of Materials and Applications.Nano-micro letters · 2026Review
- Modeling and simulation of a porous mobility total ankle arthroplasty implant: enhancing bone-in growth and reducing micromotion for improved fixation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Patient-specific osteoarticular reconstruction of the proximal tibia for giant cell tumor using a 3D-printed trabecular implant and hinged knee arthroplasty: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Titanium-Based Biomaterial for Human Bone Scaffolds: Narrative Review on Design, Fabrication, Surface Engineering, Implantation, and Biological Evaluation.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Design and optimisation of patient-specific porous femoral stems.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Dental Implantology in Acromegaly: Pathophysiological Challenges, Biomaterial Interactions, and Future Directions-A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Does the ratio of stem-to-femur length matter? A validated finite element analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTotal joint replacements are an established treatment for patients suffering from reduced mobility and pain due to severe joint damage. Aseptic loosening due to stress shielding is currently one of the main reasons for revision surgery. As this phenomenon is related to a mismatch in mechanical properties between implant and bone, stiffness reduction of implants has been of major interest in new implant designs. Facilitated by modern additive manufacturing technologies, the introduction of porosity into implant materials has been shown to enable significant stiffness reduction; however, whether these devices mitigate stress-shielding associated complications or device failure remains poorly understood.
methodsIn this systematic review, a broad literature search was conducted in six databases (Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, Compendex, and Inspec) aiming to identify current design approaches to target stress shielding through controlled porous structures. The search keywords included 'lattice,' 'implant,' 'additive manufacturing,' and 'stress shielding.'
resultsAfter the screening of 2530 articles, a total of 46 studies were included in this review. Studies focusing on hip, knee, and shoulder replacements were found. Three porous design strategies were identified, specifically uniform, graded, and optimized designs. The latter included personalized design approaches targeting stress shielding based on patient-specific data. All studies reported a reduction of stress shielding achieved by the presented design.
conclusionNot all studies used quantitative measures to describe the improvements, and the main stress shielding measures chosen varied between studies. However, due to the nature of the optimization approaches, optimized designs were found to be the most promising. Besides the stiffness reduction, other factors such as mechanical strength can be considered in the design on a patient-specific level. While it was found that controlled porous designs are overall promising to reduce stress shielding, further research and clinical evidence are needed to determine the most superior design approach for total joint replacement implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.