ArticleBMC cancer2023
Prognostic significance of preoperative serum tumor markers in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach (HAS).
Article in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Preoperative tumor marker burden score predicts survival in colorectal cancer according to tumor size.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Diagnostic dilemmas in hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: Navigating clinical and pathological loopholes.World journal of methodology · 2026Review
- Durable response to FOLFOX plus serplulimab in AFP-producing gastric adenocarcinoma with liver metastases: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Spontaneous rupture of hepatic metastasis as the initial presentation of gastric hepatoid adenocarcinoma: a rare case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- The value of translational therapy in the treatment of advanced hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Case Report: Second-line favourable effect of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: discrimination from conventional gastric adenocarcinoma with a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- A case study of unexplained multiple hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the bone.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Clinicopathological features of hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: A multicenter retrospective study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Liver metastasis from hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe role of preoperative serum tumor markers in HAS patients was vague, we designed the study to explore the effect of preoperative serum tumor markers on predicting the prognosis of HAS patients.
methodsA total of 139 patients were included according to the different tumor makers. X-tile tool was employed to identify the optimal cut-off values of respective tumor makers. Multivariate analyses were conducted to determine independent risk factors.
resultsThe optimal cut-off value of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) for 3-years overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 516 ng/mL. Patients with high-level AFP values assumed significantly worse OS and RFS than those with low-level AFP values (P = 0.028 and P = 0.011, respectively). The optimal cut-off value of Carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 for OS and RFS was 51.3 U/mL. And the survival results were similar with AFP in the aspects of OS and RFS (P = 0.009 and P < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that high serum AFP was an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients (HR7.264; 95% CI 1.328-39.738; P = 0.022 and HR 2.688; 95% CI 0.922-7.836; P = 0.070, respectively). CA19-9 could perform as a fair substitute to predict the HAS patients' OS and RFS when the preoperative serum AFP was unavailable (HR 7.816; 95% CI 2.084-29.308; P = 0.002 and HR 4.386; 95% CI 1.824-10.547; P = 0.001, respectively). Other tumor markers didn't present significant influences.
conclusionsApplying preoperative serum AFP level to predict the HAS patients' prognosis is feasible and preoperative serum high-AFP is an independent risk factor for OS and RFS of HAS patients. Preoperative serum CA19-9 could be an alternative choice when AFP was absent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.