Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647034›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

The roles of risk perception, negative emotions and perceived efficacy in the association between COVID-19 infection cues and preventive behaviors: a moderated mediation model.

Guangteng Meng, Qi Li, Xiaoyan Yuan, Ya Zheng, Kesong Hu, Bibing Dai, Xun Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evolutionarily Optimal Risk Aversion.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Guangteng MengCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Qi LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, 100048, China.
Xiaoyan YuanBig Data Group, Smart Platform R&D Department, Tianjin Meiteng Technology Co., Ltd, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Ya ZhengDepartment of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116044, China.
Kesong HuDepartment of Psychology, Lake Superior State University, Sault St. Marie, MI, USA. hkesong@gmail.com.
Bibing DaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China. daibibing@tmu.edu.cn.
Xun LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
Capital Normal University · CNDalian Medical University · CNInstitute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNLake Superior State University · USTianjin Medical University · CNUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

2021 Tianjin Municipal Education Commission Scientific Research Plan Special Task Project (Mental Health Education) Key Project 2021ZDGX08National Natural Science Foundation of China 31571161Open Research Fund of the CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Key Project of Beijing Education Science Planning BEAA21046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventive behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic are especially critical to the protection of individuals whose family members or acquaintances have been infected. However, limited research has explored the influence of infection cues on preventive behaviors. This study proposed an interaction model of environment-cognitive/affective-behavior to elucidate the mechanism by which infection cues influence preventive behaviors and the roles of risk perception, negative emotions, and perceived efficacy in that influence. To explore the relationships among these factors, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey in 34 provinces in China during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 26,511 participants responded to the survey, and 20,205 valid responses (76.2%) were obtained for further analysis. The moderated mediation results show that infection cues positively predicted preventive behaviors in a manner mediated by risk perception and negative emotions. Moreover, perceived efficacy moderated the influence of infection cues not only on preventive behaviors but also on risk perception and negative emotions. The higher the perceived efficacy, the stronger these influences were. These findings validated our model, which elucidates the mechanisms underlying the promoting effect of infection cues on preventive behaviors during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. The implications of these results for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesCuesEmotionsHealth BehaviorHumansPandemicsPerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19Infection cuesNegative emotionsPerceived efficacyPreventive behaviorsRisk perception

Identifiers

PMID36647034
PMCPMC9841495
OpenAlexW4316466585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.