Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36647024›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2023

A cross-sectional study on knowledge and behavior regarding medication usage among guardians of left-behind children: evidence from China.

Qiaoyue Ge, Yao Zhou, Zeyuan Sun, Xia Jiang, Lu Zhang, Chunsong Yang, Yixin Guo, Ting Luo, Yuzhi Fu, Qunfen Xu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiaoyue Ge *Institute of Systems Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu, China.
Yao Zhou *Department of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zeyuan SunDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Xia JiangInstitute of Systems Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu, China.
Lu ZhangInstitute of Systems Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu, China.
Chunsong YangDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yixin GuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ting LuoDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuzhi FuDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qunfen XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wei ZhouDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qian WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xianghong LianDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhenmi LiuInstitute of Systems Epidemiology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, Chengdu, China. zhenmiliu@scu.edu.cn.
Yunzhu LinDepartment of Pharmacy, Evidence-based Pharmacy Center, West China Second University Hospital, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. linyunzhu99@163.com.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CNWest China Medical Center of Sichuan University · CNKing's College London · GB

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U20A20411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate knowledge and behavior of medication use among guardians of left-behind children (LBC) and non-left-behind children (NLBC).

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Chengdu, the major city of southwestern China from May 2020 to August 2020. A logistic regression model was conducted to assess medication-related knowledge and behavior of guardians between the LBC group and NLBC group, adjusted for confounders. Stratified analysis was further performed.

resultsThe overall mean scores for knowledge and for behavior were 20.22 (standard deviation = 4.472) and 15.77 (standard deviation = 3.604), respectively. No significant difference was found in medication-related knowledge and behavior scores between LBC and NLBC guardians (P > 0.05). A significant difference was only observed after adjusting for past medical history and history of present illness (HPI).

conclusionThere was no significant difference in the awareness and behavior of medication use between guardians of LBC and NLBC in this study, having more contact with the doctor was an effective method of health education that could possibly improve their health literacy.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsA cross-sectional studyLeft-behind childrenMedications

Identifiers

PMID36647024
PMCPMC9841683
OpenAlexW4316467905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.