ArticleNature chemical biology2023
The 'Big Bang' of the chemical universe.
Article in Nature chemical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Meta-analysis and review of in silico methods in drug discovery - part 1: technological evolution and trends from big data to chemical space.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2025Pooled it
- Assessing the ligand native-like pose using a quantum mechanical-derived hydropathic score for protein-ligand complementarity.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- The (r)evolution of chemical space and molecular modeling: a time-resolved perspective.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Review
- Predicting small molecule-RNA interactions without RNA tertiary structures.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- A Benchmark Set of Bioactive Molecules for Diversity Analysis of Compound Libraries and Combinatorial Chemical Spaces.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- The Six Ds of Exponentials and drug discovery: A path toward reversing Eroom's law.Drug discovery today · 2025Review
- One size does not fit all: revising traditional paradigms for assessing accuracy of QSAR models used for virtual screening.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
36646955What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.