Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36646891›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2023

De novo genome assembly and analyses of 12 founder inbred lines provide insights into maize heterosis.

Baobao Wang, Mei Hou, Junpeng Shi, Lixia Ku, Wei Song, Chunhui Li, Qiang Ning, Xin Li, Changyu Li, Binbin Zhao and 29 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
42.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Hybrid origin and phenotype evolution of the modern maize.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Achieving High-Density and Stress-Resilient Maize Breeding Via Germplasm Innovation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Additive and Partially Dominant Effects from Genomic Variation Contribute to Rice Heterosis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Baobao Wang *Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mei Hou *Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1955-038X
Junpeng Shi *State Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry & National Maize Improvement Center, Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Lixia Ku *College of Agronomy and National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei Song *Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chunhui Li *Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiang NingNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5353-424X
Xin LiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Changyu LiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Binbin ZhaoBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ruyang ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-9169
Hua XuBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhijing BaiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhanchao XiaBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hai WangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-1518
Dexin KongGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Hongbin WeiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Yifeng JingGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhouyan DaiGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Hu Hailing WangGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyu ZhuGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Chunhui LiBeijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xuan SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shuaishuai WangBeijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China.
Wen YaoCollege of Agronomy and National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Gege HouCollege of Agronomy and National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China.
Zhi QiKey Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biology, Ministry of Education, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China.
He DaiBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-7939
Xuming LiBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5049-9706
Hongkun ZhengBiomarker Technologies Corporation, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-3615
Zuxin ZhangNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8697-1681
Yu LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Tianyu WangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7254-7449
Taijiao JiangInstitute of Systems Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Suzhou, China.
Zhaoman WanInstitute of Systems Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Suzhou, China.
Yanhui ChenCollege of Agronomy and National Key Laboratory of Wheat and Maize Crop Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China. chenyanhui@henau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5163-1393
Jiuran ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture & Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China. maizezhao@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5538-7236
Jinsheng LaiState Key Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry & National Maize Improvement Center, Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China. jlai@cau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9202-9641
Haiyang WangGuangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. whyang@scau.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1302-5747
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNSouth China Agricultural University · CNBeijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences · CNHenan Agricultural University · CNChina Agricultural University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHuazhong Agricultural University · CNInner Mongolia University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybrid maize displays superior heterosis and contributes over 30% of total worldwide cereal production. However, the molecular mechanisms of heterosis remain obscure. Here we show that structural variants (SVs) between the parental lines have a predominant role underpinning maize heterosis. De novo assembly and analyses of 12 maize founder inbred lines (FILs) reveal abundant genetic variations among these FILs and, through expression quantitative trait loci and association analyses, we identify several SVs contributing to genomic and phenotypic differentiations of various heterotic groups. Using a set of 91 diallel-cross F

Indexed as

Hybrid VigorZea maysEdible GrainGenome, PlantHybridization, GeneticPlant BreedingQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID36646891
OpenAlexW4316506846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.