ArticleScientific reports2023
Prognostic costimulatory molecule-related signature risk model correlates with immunotherapy response in colon cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- CD137L and colorectal cancer prognosis: Insights from clinical and TCGA data analysis.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Clinical characteristics of thyroid eye disease and expression profile of peripheral blood immune cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- CD81 and CD82 expressing tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the NSCLC tumor microenvironment play a crucial role in T-cell activation and cytokine production.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Identification of Key Prognostic Alternative Splicing Events of Costimulatory Molecule-Related Genes in Colon Cancer.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024Article
- Integrated single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing analysis identifies a prognostic signature related to ferroptosis dependence in colorectal cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Costimulatory molecules can promote the activation and proliferation of T cells and play an essential role in immunotherapy. However, their role in the prognosis of colon adenocarcinoma remains elusive. In this study, the expression data of costimulatory molecules and clinicopathological information of 429 patients with colon adenocarcinoma were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. The patients were divided into training and verification cohorts. Correlation, Cox regression, and Lasso regression analyses were performed to identify costimulatory molecules related to prognosis. After mentioning the construction of the risk mode, a nomogram integrating the clinical characteristics and risk scores of patients was constructed to predict prognosis. Eventually, three prognostic costimulatory molecules were identified and used for constructing a risk model. High expression of these three molecules indicated a poor prognosis. The predictive accuracy of the risk model was verified in the GSE17536 dataset. Subsequently, multivariate regression analysis showed that the signature based on the three costimulatory molecules was an independent risk factor in the training cohort (HR = 2.12; 95% CI = 1.26, 3.56). Based on the risk model and clinicopathological data, the AUC values for predicting the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability of patients with colon adenocarcinoma were 0.77, 0.77, and 0.71, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report a risk signature constructed based on the costimulatory molecules TNFRSF10c, TNFRSF13c, and TNFRSF11a. This risk signature can serve as a prognostic biomarker for colon adenocarcinoma and is related to the immunotherapeutic response of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.