ArticleScientific reports2023
Decoding of the speech envelope from EEG using the VLAAI deep neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-time brain-controlled selective hearing enhances speech perception in multi-talker environments.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Closing the Loop on the Cocktail Party Effect: From Attention Decoding to Neuro-Steered Selective Hearing.Biology · 2026Article
- Enhancing EEG Decoding with Selective Augmentation Integration.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sensory sharpening and semantic prediction errors unify competing models of predictive processing in human speech comprehension.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Progress, challenges and future of linguistic neural decoding with deep learning.Communications biology · 2025Review
- Contrastive representation learning with transformers for robust auditory EEG decoding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Speech Reception Threshold Estimation via EEG-Based Continuous Speech Envelope Reconstruction.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Classifying coherent versus nonsense speech perception from EEG using linguistic speech features.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Convolutional neural networks can identify brain interactions involved in decoding spatial auditory attention.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Structural and functional brain changes in people with knee osteoarthritis: a scoping review.PeerJ · 2023Article
- ADT Network: A Novel Nonlinear Method for Decoding Speech Envelopes From EEG Signals.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the processing of speech in the brain, commonly simple linear models are used to establish a relationship between brain signals and speech features. However, these linear models are ill-equipped to model a highly-dynamic, complex non-linear system like the brain, and they often require a substantial amount of subject-specific training data. This work introduces a novel speech decoder architecture: the Very Large Augmented Auditory Inference (VLAAI) network. The VLAAI network outperformed state-of-the-art subject-independent models (median Pearson correlation of 0.19, p < 0.001), yielding an increase over the well-established linear model by 52%. Using ablation techniques, we identified the relative importance of each part of the VLAAI network and found that the non-linear components and output context module influenced model performance the most (10% relative performance increase). Subsequently, the VLAAI network was evaluated on a holdout dataset of 26 subjects and a publicly available unseen dataset to test generalization for unseen subjects and stimuli. No significant difference was found between the default test and the holdout subjects, and between the default test set and the public dataset. The VLAAI network also significantly outperformed all baseline models on the public dataset. We evaluated the effect of training set size by training the VLAAI network on data from 1 up to 80 subjects and evaluated on 26 holdout subjects, revealing a relationship following a hyperbolic tangent function between the number of subjects in the training set and the performance on unseen subjects. Finally, the subject-independent VLAAI network was finetuned for 26 holdout subjects to obtain subject-specific VLAAI models. With 5 minutes of data or more, a significant performance improvement was found, up to 34% (from 0.18 to 0.25 median Pearson correlation) with regards to the subject-independent VLAAI network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.