ArticleNature communications2023
3D printing of thermosets with diverse rheological and functional applicabilities.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using Electric Fields for in Situ Curing of Carbon Fiber/Phenolic Composites in Additive Manufacturing.ACS applied engineering materials · 2026Article
- Data-Driven Printability Modeling of Hydrogels for Precise Direct Ink Writing Based on Rheological Properties.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Proximal sound printing: direct 3D printing of microstructures on polymers.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2026Article
- Development of an efficient approach to boost fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing of felodipine-HPMC tablets for enhanced physical stability.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- Multimaterial 3D Printing in Activating Bath Enables In Situ Polymerization of Thermosets with Intricate Geometries and Diverse Elastic Behaviors.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Article
- Porous carbons with complex 3D geometries via selective laser sintering of whey powder.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Neural network-enabled, all-electronic control of non-Newtonian fluid flow.Applied physics letters · 2024Article
- Advancing 3D printed microfluidics with computational methods for sweat analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- Thermo-Mechanical Characterization of 4D-Printed Biodegradable Shape-Memory Scaffolds Using Four-Axis 3D-Printing System.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Simultaneous rheology and cure kinetics dictate thermal post-curing of thermoset composite resins for material extrusion.Additive manufacturing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Thermosets such as silicone are ubiquitous. However, existing manufacturing of thermosets involves either a prolonged manufacturing cycle (e.g., reaction injection molding), low geometric complexity (e.g., casting), or limited processable materials (e.g., frontal polymerization). Here, we report an in situ dual heating (ISDH) strategy for the rapid 3D printing of thermosets with complex structures and diverse rheological properties by incorporating direct ink writing (DIW) technique and a heating-accelerated in situ gelation mechanism. Enabled by an integrated Joule heater at the printhead, extruded thermosetting inks can quickly cure in situ, allowing for DIW of various thermosets with viscosities spanning five orders of magnitude, printed height over 100 mm, and high resolution of 50 μm. We further demonstrate DIW of a set of heterogenous thermosets using multiple functional materials and present a hybrid printing of a multilayer soft electronic circuit. Our ISDH strategy paves the way for fast manufacturing of thermosets for various emerging fields.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.